Stolen Art Watch, Gardner Art Offered To Joseph 'Uncle Joe' Ligambi, Joey Merlino In The "Boca Raton" Frame

 
Art Hostage Comments:
Joseph "Joey" Merlino in The Frame

The Gardner art was offered to Uncle Joe Ligambi, via Joseph "Mousie" Massimino  back in 2001 and the indications are, or the spin coming from the sources close to the Philly family are he failed to secure them. However, what with Uncle Joe looking like he will walk soon, if the retrial fails to convict him, perhaps the FBI could offer him immunity and the Gardner Museum could firm up their reward offer of $5 million, then finally the Gardner art may come home. However, perhaps authorities are banking on a conviction at the April retrial (Now postponed until October 2013) to use as leverage to smoke out the Gardner art.
Heat is focused on Boca Raton where Joey Merlino is residing after being released from jail as he could hold the key to the Gardner art and authorities hope this current publicity will provoke the vital lead that could see the Gardner art surface. Expect a raid of the home of Joey Merlino if no positive leads devleops.
Furthermore, time to announce the recovery of 
Degas, La Sortie de Pesage
Degas, Cortège aux Environs de Florence
 as it has been under wraps all this time.

Art Hostage would like to yet again publicly state no desire for any reward money, fake or real and would only be too happy to pass on the location of where the Gardner art can be found, no arrests, no stings, no strings, not requests for reward at all.

Remember Art Hostage first called for the Gardner art to be deposited in a Catholic Church Confession box over a decade ago, right about the time the Gardner art was being offered in Philadelphia, and a Catholic Priest, Bishop or Cardinal should be used as a conduit for the safe return of the Gardner art.  
New Pope, New Dawn, Gardner Art discovered in a Catholic Church confession box, using the symbolism of absolution.

 FBI knows who Gardner thieves are but won't say

In a blockbuster announcement, the FBI said today they know the thieves who pulled off the infamous Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum heist 23 years ago today -- but they're not identifying who they are.
Those unnamed suspects are from "a criminal organization," the FBI said, who failed to fence the $500 million in masterpieces in Connecticut and the Philadelphia region in the years after the brazen break-in.
The FBI is now asking for the public's help in solving one of the worst crimes in U.S. history.
“The FBI believes with a high degree of confidence in the years after the theft the art was transported to Connecticut and the Philadelphia region and some of the art was taken to Philadelphia where it was offered for sale by those responsible for the theft.” Richard DesLauriers, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Boston office, said. “With that same confidence we have identified the thieves who are members of a criminal organization with a base in the mid-Atlantic states and New England.”
The FBI said the trail of the 13 stolen works of art has gone cold and they want to get the word out in the U.S. and "around the world." It's a campaign similar to the hunt for James "Whitey" Bulger when a renewed publicity campaign helped lead to the mobster's arrest in Southern California in 2011.
On March 18, 1990, two burglars disguised as Boston police officers broke into the Gardner museum in the Fenway neighborhood and made off with the art by masters including Rembrandt, Vermeer, Degas and Manet.
Two night guards were found in the museum’s basement handcuffed to pipes and bound with duct tape.
U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz said today the $5 million reward remains on the table and immunity is "possible" for anyone who concealed the art all these years.
"I cannot give blanket immunity without knowing the specifics," Ortiz said, adding "immunity is still available. It's a strong possibility." She also said no charges can be filed for the robbery itself, since the statute of limitations has since expired. Anyone can be charged, she added, for possession of the stolen artwork.

Here is the FBI press release:
The FBI, along with Boston’s Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts, released new information about one of the largest property crimes in U.S. history, the art theft from the museum more than two decades ago. The FBI is appealing to the public for help in what is one of the FBI’s Top Ten Art Crimes.
The FBI believes it has determined where the stolen art was transported in the years after the theft and that it knows the identity of the thieves, Richard DesLauriers, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Boston office, revealed for the first time in the 23 year investigation. “The FBI believes with a high degree of confidence in the years after the theft the art was transported to Connecticut and the Philadelphia region and some of the art was taken to Philadelphia where it was offered for sale by those responsible for the theft.” DesLauriers added, “With that same confidence we have identified the thieves who are members of a criminal organization with a base in the mid-Atlantic states and New England.” After the attempted sale, which took place approximately a decade ago, the FBI’s knowledge of the art’s whereabouts is limited.
Information is being sought from those who possess, or know the whereabouts of, the 13 stolen works of art, including rare paintings by Rembrandt and Vermeer, by publicizing new details about the case and continuing to highlight the $5 million reward for the return of the art. Although the FBI does not know where the art is currently located, the FBI is continuing its search, both in and beyond the Connecticut and Philadelphia areas. “With this announcement, we want to widen the ‘aperture of awareness’ of this crime, to the reach the American public and others around the world,” said DesLauriers.
Anthony Amore, the museum’s chief of security, noted that the reward is for “information that leads directly to the recovery of all of our items in good condition.” He further explained, “You don’t have to hand us the paintings to be eligible for the reward. We hope that through this media campaign people will see how earnest we are in our attempts to pay this reward and make our institution whole. We simply want to recover our paintings and move forward. Today marks 23 years since the robbery. It’s time for these paintings to come home.”
“The investigation into the Gardner Museum theft has been an active and aggressive effort, with law enforcement following leads and tracking down potential sources of information around the globe. Over the past three years, I have visited the museum several times, and each time I entered the Dutch Room and saw the empty frames, I was reminded of the enormous impact of this theft. I do remain optimistic that one day soon the paintings will be returned to their rightful place in the Fenway, as Mrs. Gardner intended,” said U.S. Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz. “As we have said in the past, the U.S. Attorney’s Office will consider the possibility of immunity from criminal prosecution for information that leads to the return of the paintings based on the set of facts and circumstances brought to our attention. Our primary goal is, and always has been, to have the paintings returned.”
To recover stolen items and prosecute art and cultural property crime, the FBI has a specialized Art Crime Team of 14 Special Agents supported by special trial attorneys. The team investigates theft, fraud, looting and trafficking across state and international lines with estimated losses running as high as $6 billion annually. The FBI also runs the National Stolen Art File, a computerized index of stolen art and cultural properties that is used as a reference by law enforcement agencies worldwide.
The FBI stressed that anyone with information about the artwork may contact the FBI at 1-800-CALL FBI (1-800-225-5324) or the museum directly or through a third party, said Special Agent Geoffrey Kelly, who is the lead investigator for the theft and a member of the art crime team, “In the past, people who realize they are in possession of stolen art have returned the art in a variety of ways, including through third parties, attorneys and anonymously leaving items in churches or at police stations.” Tips may also be submitted online at https://tips.fbi.gov.
The publicity campaign announced today includes a dedicated FBI website on the Gardner Museum theft, video postings on FBI social media sites, publicity on digital billboards in Philadelphia region, and a podcast. To view and listen to these items, link to the FBI’s new website about the theft: www.FBI.gov/gardner.
Here is a list of the art stolen ...
Rembrandt, The Storm on the Sea of Galilee, 1633

Rembrandt, A Lady and Gentleman in Black, 1633

Vermeer, The Concert, 1658–1660

Manet, Chez Tortoni, 1878–1880

Govaert Flinck, Landscape with an Obelisk, 1638

Degas, La Sortie de Pesage

Degas, Cortège aux Environs de Florence

Degas, Program for an Artistic Soirée, Study 2, 1884

Degas, Program for an Artistic Soirée, 1884

Chinese Bronze Beaker or Ku, 1200–1100 B.C.

Finial in the form of an eagle, French, 1813–1814

Degas, Three Mounted Jockeys

Rembrandt, Self-Portrait, ca. 1634

 Uncle Joe, Gardner Art & Retrial

JOSEPH LIGAMBI may be a gray-haired 73-year-old who is quick with a smile and wisecrack for family and friends in the courtroom, but to federal prosecutors he is much too "cunning" and "vicious" to be released on bail while awaiting retrial for racketeering conspiracy and related charges.
After hearing spirited arguments Monday from prosecutors and defense attorney Edwin Jacobs Jr., U.S. District Judge Eduardo Robreno rejected Ligambi's bail motion, ensuring that he will sit in a jail cell as he prepares for his April 16 retrial.
Ligambi, who is known as "Uncle Joe" and is believed to be the boss of Philadelphia's La Cosa Nostra mob, came to court in a green prison jumpsuit and left taking the ruling, seemingly, in stride.

"That was a surprise," he said, grinning at his supporters as a marshal cuffed him.
"That was a cliff-hanger," Jacobs deadpanned.
Earlier this month, Ligambi was found not guilty of five criminal counts by a federal jury, which deadlocked on four other counts.
The jury - which sat through three months of testimony and deliberated for 21 days - acquitted Ligambi co-defendant Joseph "Scoops" Licata. Reputed underboss Joseph "Mousie" Massimino, mob soldier Damion Canalichio and mob associate Gary Battaglini were convicted of racketeering conspiracy. Anthony Staino was convicted of loan-sharking.
Ligambi's nephew, former mob consigliere George Borgesi, who's been imprisoned since 2000, was acquitted of 13 counts but remains jailed on a single racketeering-conspiracy count on which the jury deadlocked.
In all, the jury found the seven alleged mobsters guilty on five counts, not guilty on 46 and deadlocked on 11. The latter 11 counts paved the way for the feds to seek retrials.
During Monday's hearing, Jacobs argued that the government's failure to win any convictions against Ligambi should entitle him to bail, which his family could pay with more than $500,000 in equity from six to seven homes, Jacobs said.
U.S. Attorney Frank Labor countered that the charges Ligambi faces retrial for and the convictions of his co-defendants establish that he is a danger to the community and should stay jailed.

Stolen Art Watch, Gardner Art Heist, 23 Years On, Rewind To Begining

Guard who opened the door to robbers in notorious Gardner Museum heist under suspicion 23 years later

By Stephen Kurkjian

Globe Correspondent /  March 9, 2013

 http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2013/03/09/guard-who-opened-the-door-robbers-notorious-gardner-museum-heist-under-suspicion-years-later/J9cyv9A0rRkJ1t0OYpwdvL/story.html

Night watchman Richard Abath may have made the most costly mistake in art history shortly after midnight on March 18, 1990. Police found him handcuffed and duct-taped in the basement of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum seven hours after he unwisely opened the thick oak door to two thieves who then stole 13 works of art valued at more than $500 million.

For years, investigators discounted the hapless Abath’s role in the unsolved crime, figuring his excessive drinking and pot smoking contributed to his disastrous decision to let in the robbers, who were dressed as police officers. Even if the duo had been real cops, watchmen weren’t supposed to admit anyone who showed up uninvited at 1:24 a.m.

But, after 23 years of pursuing dead ends, including a disappointing search of an alleged mobster’s home last year, investigators are focusing on intriguing evidence that suggests the former night watchman might have been in on the crime all along — or at least knows more about it than he has admitted.

Why, they ask, were Abath’s footsteps the only ones picked up on motion detectors in a first floor gallery where one of the stolen paintings, by French impressionist Edouard Manet, was taken? And why did he open the side entrance to the museum minutes before the robbers rang the buzzer to get in? Was he signaling to them that he was prepared for the robbery to begin?

No one publicly calls Abath a suspect, but federal prosecutors grilled him on these issues last fall. And one former prosecutor in the case has written a recently published novel about the Gardner heist in which the night watchman let the thieves into the museum to pay off a large cocaine debt.

“The more I learn about Rick, the more disappointed I get in him,” said Lyle W. Grindle, the former director of security at the Gardner who hired Abath in 1988.

Now, for the first time, Abath is discussing publicly what happened and admitting that some of his actions are hard to explain, but insisting he had nothing to do with what is regarded as the biggest art heist ever.

Abath, then a rock musician moonlighting as a security guard, said he opened the doors that night because he was intimidated by men dressed as police officers who claimed to be investigating a disturbance. His own uniform untucked and wearing a cowboy hat, Abath knew he looked more like a suspect than a guard.

“There they stood, two of Boston’s finest waving at me through the glass. Hats, coats, badges, they looked like cops,” Abath wrote in a manuscript on the robbery that he shared with The Globe. “I buzzed them into the museum.”

Abath, now 46 and working as a teacher’s aide in Vermont, pointed out that his explanation passed two lie detector tests right after the crime. However, he admits he can’t explain why motion sensors in the gallery that housed the Manet detected footsteps only at the two times Abath said he was in the room — and not later when Abath was bound in the basement and the thieves were looting other galleries.

“I totally get it. I understand how suspicious it all is,” said Abath in a recent interview. “But I don’t understand why [investigators] think . . . I should know an alternative theory as to what happened or why it did happen.”

Now that FBI agents have captured elusive mobster James “Whitey” Bulger, the fate of the Gardner’s stolen masterpieces by Rembrandt, Vermeer, Degas and Manet has replaced “where’s Whitey?” as Boston’s most enduring mystery.

No one has ever been charged in the crime and seemingly promising leads, like the one that led to the search of alleged mobster Robert Gentile’s Connecticut home last May, have invariably fizzled. With no sign of the art works, investigators are left to wonder if the thieves died and took their secret to the grave, or if they are in prison and unwilling to cooperate out of fear of retribution by other conspirators.

But US Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz said the investigation — carried out by her office, the FBI, and Gardner security director Anthony Amore — remains “active, and, at times, fast-moving” even though the statute of limitations for prosecuting the robbery ran out in 1995. Ortiz could still charge anyone possessing the stolen paintings, but she said her office would consider immunity in return for help recovering the masterpieces.

“I am optimistic, and in fact everyone involved in this investigation is optimistic, that one day soon those paintings will be returned to their rightful place in the Fenway,” said Ortiz in a statement.

Abath, who agreed to speak to the Globe to gain publicity for a book he is writing about the robbery, said he first realized he was under suspicion four years ago when FBI agents asked to meet him at a Brattleboro, Vt., coffee shop.

“After 19 years of not hearing a word from the people charged with the task of solving the Great Museum Robbery, they popped up; they wanted to talk,” Abath wrote in the manuscript he shared. To his surprise, one agent told him, “You know, we’ve never been able to eliminate you as a suspect.”

And, he said, they told him they had been watching his bank accounts for years for any signs of sudden wealth.

But if Abath was part of a $500 million art heist, his lifestyle in Brattleboro certainly doesn’t reflect it. He lives with his wife in a modest apartment outside the center of town, where he moved in 1999 to be close to his two children from an earlier relationship.

But investigators say that Abath’s partying lifestyle during the two years he worked at the Gardner could have brought him in contact with the kind of people who might plot a major art theft.

In 1990, Abath was a Berklee School of Music dropout and a member of the struggling rock group Ukiah, and sometimes showed up for the midnight shift at the Gardner drunk or stoned. In a 2005 interview with the Globe — under a grant of anonymity — Abath admitted using marijuana and alcohol before work. In the recent interview, he said he sometimes took LSD and cocaine, too.

The 23-year-old was chronically short of money — the Gardner paid just $7.35 an hour, and his band had to scrape for gigs — so he staged monthly keg parties in Allston that drew hundreds of college-age kids, most of whom were strangers, to raise funds.

On several occasions, he recalled, others who worked as Gardner guards or night watchmen would show up, and invariably the conversation would turn to the inadequacy of the Gardner’s security system, which was plagued by false alarms and featured just a single panic button in case of emergency, located at the front security desk.

“Could someone who had friends who were robbers or in the underworld have heard us complaining how awful the security system was? Absolutely. We were talking about it in the open all the time,” Abath said. “But did I know someone picked it up and used it to rob the place? Absolutely not.”

But investigators are reluctant to rule out the possibility that the thieves had help from the inside since studies show that nearly 90 percent of museum robberies worldwide turn out to be inside jobs. And they’ve questioned Abath closely about his circle of friends and acquaintances in 1990.

On the night of the robbery, Abath said he showed up for work completely sober, having just given his two-week notice to quit the boring job. He and one other watchman would take turns patrolling the museum and staffing the security desk.

Coincidentally, the nearby Museum of Fine Arts had adopted a new security procedure that required night watchmen to get a supervisor’s permission before admitting people after hours — the guards had refused entrance to real Boston police officers who came to the door a few months earlier.

“The museum was at its most vulnerable during the night shift,” explained William P. McAuliffe, the former top State Police commander who instituted the policy after taking over MFA security in 1989. “The entire security rested in the hands of one or two people.”

The Gardner took no such precautions, leaving Abath to make his own decision when the faux police officers rang the buzzer at the entrance on Palace Road at 1:24 a.m. They had been sitting quietly for at least an hour in a civilian car — witnesses recalled it as a hatchback — perhaps trying to avoid the glances of several tipsy college-age people who had emerged from a St. Patrick’s Day party in a nearby apartment building.

About 20 minutes before the thieves came to the door, Abath did something that prompted investigators to ask whether he was signaling the robbers: He opened and then quickly shut the Palace Road door after he had toured the museum galleries and was about to replace his partner at the security desk.

Gardner security officials say that their guards were not supposed to open doors as part of their patrol, and federal investigators have told Abath that none of the other watchmen they interviewed did so.

But Abath vehemently denies he had any bad intentions in opening the museum door.

“I did it to make sure for myself that the door was securely locked,” Abath said. “I don’t know what the others did, but I was trained to do it that way.” He said security logs would show that he tested the door on other nights as well. The FBI seized the logs, but has declined to comment on what they show.

Abath said he knew he wasn’t supposed to let uninvited guests inside, but he was less clear on whether the rule applied to police officers. With his partner patrolling the galleries, Abath decided to buzz inside the men dressed as police officers.

As the pair walked into the Gardner, Abath was at the security desk with quick access to the panic button that would have notified a security firm of an emergency. But one of the thieves — who Abath said was about 5 feet 7 inches tall, with gold-rimmed glasses and a “greasy looking mustache” — asked him to step away, saying, “I think there is a warrant out for your arrest.”

In quick succession, Abath said the officers asked for his ID, put him up against the wall and handcuffed him. Abath said he thought it was just a misunderstanding until he realized the officers hadn’t frisked him before he was cuffed — and the officer’s mustache was made of wax.

“We were being robbed!” Abath wrote in his manuscript.

Abath and his partner, who was also handcuffed as soon as he arrived at the security desk, were wrapped in duct tape and taken to different areas of the basement where they remained until police found them eight hours later. By then, the thieves — along with Rembrandt’s “The Storm on the Sea of Galilee,” Vermeer’s “The Concert,” and the other art works — were long gone.

Although the masterpieces the thieves stole are valued in the millions, they left behind what is considered Boston’s most prized painting, Titian’s “Rape of Europa,” leaving investigators to wonder about their sophistication. The brutishness with which they treated the art, cutting two Rembrandts from their golden frames while breaking the frames on two Degas sketches, convinced investigators that the men were common criminals taking advantage of a “score” rather than experts commissioned to steal particular works.

Perhaps most baffling is why they spent only 81 minutes inside the museum, mostly in the Dutch Room and Short Gallery on the second floor, when they could have continued undetected for hours.

Equally perplexing, motion detectors that tripped as the thieves made their way through other areas failed to record them entering or leaving the first floor’s Blue Room, where “Chez Tortoni” by Manet was taken. There, the only footsteps detected, at 12:27 and again at 12:53 a.m., matched the times Abath said he passed through on patrol.

Adding to the strangeness, police found the frame from the Manet on security chief Grindle’s chair near the security desk. Was this the gesture of a disgruntled employee sending a message to the boss?

Abath said investigators all but accused him of stealing the missing Manet.

“They wanted to know if I had taken the painting and stashed it somewhere,” Abath said. “I told them as I’ve said a hundred times before and since, I had absolutely nothing to do with the robbers or the robbery.”

Abath’s denials did not deter James J. McGovern, who worked on the federal investigation for the US Attorney’s office in 2006, from writing a novel that portrays a night security guard as an accomplice in the Gardner heist.

In 2012’s “Artful Deception,” McGovern writes that the watchman let the thieves inside to pay off a large cocaine debt. The character with whom the night watchman makes the deal closely resembles David A. Turner, the 1985 Braintree High graduate who has long been considered a suspect in the robbery.

Turner was sentenced to nearly 40 years in prison for involvement in a 1999 scheme to rob an armored car warehouse in Easton, a plot that he has contended in court was set up by the FBI to force his cooperation in solving the Gardner crime.

But Abath said he never had any connection to Turner — and has no recollection of buying cocaine from him — though he does say that Turner looks vaguely like the younger, more stocky of the two thieves.

Despite the lingering suspicions about his conduct on the night of the robbery and the admitted excesses of his lifestyle at the time, Abath said he does not feel ashamed that his actions led to the greatest loss of art masterpieces in world history.

“I know I wasn’t suppose to let strangers into the museum after hours, but no one told me what to do if the police showed up saying they were there to investigate a disturbance,” Abath said. “What was I supposed to do?”

Stephen Kurkjian can be reached at stephenkurkjian@gmail.com.

Stolen Art Watch, Gardner Art Heist, False Dawn Yet Again As Bogus Reward and Bogus Immunity Don't Fool Anyone Anymore !!

Reputed mobster suspected in Gardner heist pleads guilty to gun, drug charges

HARTFORD, Conn. — Robert Gentile, the reputed Connecticut mobster the feds believe has information that can crack the decades-old Gardner Museum heist, was working with authorities for 10 months to help track down the purloined paintings before they pinched him on drug and gun charges, all to simply squeeze him for more details, his lawyer said today after Gentile pleaded guilty to all counts.
Hunched over a cane and sitting in a wheelchair, the 76-year-old Gentile admitted to a federal court judge he worked with a co-defendant to deal oxycodone to an FBI informant and that he couldn’t turn down a deal to sell other prescription pills, claiming he “got caught in a trap.”
“I was wrong,” a gruff Gentile said, adding he didn’t want to drag out the court process because of his age and failing health. “I don’t have many more years left to fight the case. I don’t want to cause any more problems.”


Neither Gentile nor prosecutors addressed allegations he knows something about the famous 1990 robbery at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, a claim Gentile has roundly denied even as authorities scoured his Manchester home in February and May. Authorities didn’t find any paintings but instead found a cache of guns, $22,000 and more pills.
-
But after the hearing, his lawyer, Ryan McGuigan, said Gentile plans to address the accusations fully when he is sentenced on Feb. 6. He added that Gentile worked with authorities for roughly 10 months in the investigation, including testifying before a grand jury, but stressed his client has never known where they were stashed. Thieves stole 13 works of art from the museum, valued at $500 million. Gentile was arrested earlier this year.
-
“He knew some of the individuals that the government believes may have had something to do with the heist,” McGuigan said, adding that likely, “ninety-nine percent of the people who were involved are dead.
-
“He is the last, best hope of finding the paintings,” he said of Gentile. “Now he’s paying the price.”
Under his plea, Gentile has agreed to sentencing guidelines of 46 to 57 months in jail, or a maximum just under five years, plus a lifetime of supervised release and up to a $100,000 fine, though the judge is free to set different terms.
Gentile had faced up to 150 years in prison on the nine counts against him.

Reputed Connecticut mobster told federal grand jury he knew nothing about Gardner Museum art heist

HARTFORD – Reputed mobster Robert V. Gentile has testified before a federal grand jury probing the 1990 Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum art heist that he does not know who stole the priceless paintings from the Boston landmark, Gentile’s attorney said today after his client pleaded guilty to drug and weapons charges.
-
Gentile, according to attorney A. Ryan McGuigan, was questioned by federal prosecutors this year about Boston area crime figures whose names have been linked to the thefts of the 13 paintings, which include works by Rembrandt, Vermeer, Degas and Manet.
Gentile was also questioned before the grand jury about Robert Guarente, a Mafia figure who died in 2004 and whose widow said he provided Gentile with a stolen painting before his death, his attorney said.
-
But McGuigan said Gentile provided nothing to federal officials that will solve the biggest museum theft in history. He said Gentile does not know who committed the crime nor does he know what happened to the paintings in the 22 years since the robbery.
“They were obviously not satisfied with the information that he had,’’ McGuigan said. “But unfortunately, that is all they had.’’
-
McGuigan spoke with reporters at US District Court here after Gentile pleaded guilty to drug and firearms charges based on the discovery of prescription drugs and six guns by federal investigators when they searched Gentile’s Manchester, Conn., home in February. The Gardner art heist was not mentioned at the hearing. Gentile will be sentenced early next year and could face three or four years in federal prison under a plea agreement.
-
Gentile, 76, told US District Judge Robert N. Chatigny that he was pleading guilty to six charges because he was guilty of the crimes and because he wanted to end his life without any further interference from federal law enforcement.
“I’m pleading guilty because I am guilty. I am sorry for causing this problem,’’ Gentile said. “I don’t want any more trouble.’’
-
Gentile, who has chronic health issues, sat in a wheelchair during the hearing. He told the judge, “I want to serve my time and get home. I don’t have many years left.’’
Guarente, a Mafia figure who died in 2004 at age 65, apparently had ties to everyone publicly identified as a person of interest in the heist, according to court records, FBI reports, and State Police documents.
-
The search of Gentile's home was part of an apparently renewed effort by US Attorney Carmen Ortiz, the top federal prosecutor in Massachusetts, to solve the Gardner art theft, which has haunted both the museum and law enforcement.
-
In addition to Gentile’s house, the FBI searched the home of Anthony Carlo, a 62-year-old ex-convict living in Worcester who has a history of art theft.
-
The Gardner Musuem heist occurred in the early morning of March 18, 1990. Two men posing as police officers conned their way into the museum by telling the two security guards that they were responding to a report of a disturbance. The guards, who violated protocol by letting the officers in, were bound with duct tape. The thieves then spent 81 minutes taking the 13 masterworks.

Federal agents swarmed Gentile’s home again in May in what McGuigan called a veiled attempt to find the stolen paintings. McGuigan said at the time that the FBI got a new warrant allowing the use of ground-penetrating radar to look for buried weapons, but he believed they really were looking for the artwork.
“This is nonsense,” McGuigan said in May. “This is the FBI. Are you trying to tell me they missed something the first time? They’re trying to find $500 million of stolen artwork. ... All they’re going to find is night crawlers.”
Gentile was charged with three weapons crimes that each carried up to 10 years in prison and six drug crimes that carried up to 20 years in prison apiece. He wasn’t supposed to have any guns because of a 1990s larceny conviction.
In court Wednesday, he said he was pleading guilty to avoid the expense and aggravation of a trial. Prosecutors and his defense agreed on sentencing guidelines of 46 to 57 months in prison, but Gentile could face more or less prison time based on a report by probation officials. The sentencing hearing is scheduled for Feb. 6.

Gardner Art Heist, FBI Fishing, D.A. Dangles Drugs Plea Deal

 

Conn. drug suspect linked to Gardner heist may cop plea

Gentile Manchester Home

  http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20221008conn_drug_suspect_linked_to_gardner_heist_may_cop_plea/srvc=home&position=also

A Connecticut man who told the Herald federal prosecutors offered to broom drug charges against him if he agreed to help solve the 1990 Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum art heist is negotiating a plea deal, according to court documents filed by his attorney.
Andrew Parente, 75, and reputed gangster Robert Gentile, 76, were scheduled to go on trial tomorrow in Hartford on charges they were dealing prescription painkillers. On Friday, Judge Robert N. Chatigny pushed the proceeding back to Nov. 13 after Parente and public defender Deirdre Murray filed a motion to postpone jury selection, stating they are “engaged in negotiations” with prosecutors.
Parente and Murray did not return calls requesting comment. The U.S. Attorney’s Office also did not return calls.


Parente told the Herald in May the FBI started leaning on him about the 13 missing masterpieces by Rembrandt, Vermeer, Degas and Manet soon after he was arrested in February.
A $5 million reward for information leading to the recovery of the art valued at more than $500 million is still up for grabs.




WHDH-TV -

"Charles Vincent Sabba & Art Hostage, Separated By An Ocean, Joined by Their Desire To Recover The Worlds Most Wanted Stolen Art, Gardner Art, Public Priority Number One"

Only $5 million Reward For $500 million Stolen Masterpieces

Gardner Museum New Wing Costing Over $180 million

"Over the years Art Hostage and Charles Vincent Sabba have developed a close working and personal relationship, whereby they bring all their vast experience from both sides of the law and divide into one concentrated true vision of recovering the worlds most wanted stolen art. Together, joined by the common bond of artistic integrity, this partnership will offer a vision and pathway that see's the worlds most wanted stolen art go home to its rightful place, not least the elusive, Gardner art. Below Charles Sabba offers this first installment of what will prove to be the final part of the journey of the Gardner art on its way back home for the people of Boston, America and all of the world to reconnect with those long lost iconic masterpieces."

Read this paragraph from a news article on the Santa Monica art theft and you see clearly that the meager amount of $5 million reward for the Gardner works is an inadequate sum:

"...Jeffrey Gundlach did not know who, if anybody, would get the reward. He had offered $1 million for the return of a Mondrian painting called "Composition En Rouge Et Blanc."  

The offer is said to be the highest-ever reward for a single painting. That was the painting Gundlach said the thieves had been trying to unload..."

Now, I dig Mondrian, but $1 million for a Mondrian was offered by a guy who loved his collection and only $5 million was offered by a museum for a Vermeer, three Rembrandts, a Manet, a Flinck, drawings by Degas and a Chinese Ku! It is obvious that Gundlach loves his art.

I am not sure why the Gardner puts such a low reward offer out there, especially when they were willing to raise and spend multiple millions, $180 million to be exact,  on the controversial expansion of the museum.

Maybe it is finally time to rethink both the reward and the immunity offers up in Boston. Obviously their game plan has been to wait the bad guys out. Only a small number of men know the whereabouts of the stolen works and they are getting old and more then one of them are in bad health.

After they die, the authorities will put the squeeze on their surviving family members in hopes of gaining their cooperation for info and property searches. 

This is a bad and risky game plan, because when they pass on they may bring their secrets with them for eternity!

If the museum would raise that kind of money or, even only $100 million dollars, to offer as a reward, and a reward value is placed on each individual work, one or two of those works may just get returned swiftly (also necessary is that the passionate realists within the art world would put political pressure on the right people to hammer out a true blanket immunity in which absolutely no one had to testify, one or two of those works may just get returned swiftly).  

Charles Sabba

http://www.yourbrushwiththelaw.com/

   

Stolen Art Watch, Gardner Art Heist Through The Canvas, Charles Sabba Lecture

The Gardner Art Heist 1990

Charles Vincent Sabba Lecture Salmagundi Club New York

Part 1 Charles Vincent Sabba bio

" The Irish American thugs who pulled off the Gardner robbery were armored car robbers.
Now, they were not Turner and Reisfelder who worked for Carmelo Merlino as Ulrich Boser reported in his book the Gardner Heist, although these men would have certainly known and dealt with Merlino at his garage.

There were two Irish gangs in South Boston back in the 1970s, the Kileens and the Mullens. They had a bloody gangland war, eventually a truce was brokered and they merged under the Winterhill Gang which in time Whitey Bulger became the boss of. Old grudges still remained and Bulger never fully won the complete loyalty of all those old Mullen gang members, this is why he knew nothing about the whereabouts of the artworks.
I am telling you now and you are hearing this for the first time from me, that through my visual investigations, I believe that it was associates of the old Mullens Gang that pulled off the Gardner Museum robbery..."

Part 2



Part 3



Part 4

-For more info on Charles Sabba's Salmagundi Club art exhibition and artist talk/Gardner robbery lecture click on the following links to the video (which is in four parts) to view it on the YourBrushWithTheLaw Youtube channel here:

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anCyzfVsjqA&feature=player_embedded

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cXRGlSTbow&list=PLBA5F2ACC0B84458A&index=6&feature=plpp_video

Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhXZEqcpskk&list=PLBA5F2ACC0B84458A&index=5&feature=plpp_video

Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-CRqV4eUR8&list=PLBA5F2ACC0B84458A&index=4&feature=plpp_video

You may also view the video and other of my lectures, tv interviews and artist talks by visiting the web site www.yourbrushwiththelaw.com and then clicking link for the Roll Call Page. On the Roll Call page you then click on the Wire Page of the is listed at bottom of the 29 June post.

Stolen Art Watch, Whitey Bulger Foiled By X-Factor Carmen M. Ortiz, Legal Eagle William P. Callahan Confirms

US attorney rebuts Bulger claim of immunity

http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2012/06/26/attorney-comments-bulger-request-for-immunity-says-flemmi-tried-same-tactic-lost/QyktNVQn4JmEQMTMTwEpoJ/story.html

By Brian R. Ballou and Travis Andersen

“Being an informant in a criminal case does not in and of itself immunize you from crimes,” said US Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz, on James “Whitey” Bulger’s claim that an immunity agreement with the federal government shielded him from being charged with crimes.

A day after notorious gangster James “Whitey” Bulger claimed that an immunity agreement with the federal government shielded him from being charged with a host of crimes, US Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz said Tuesday that informants are not necessarily protected from prosecution.

“Being an informant in a criminal case does not in and of itself immunize you from crimes,” she said after an event in South Boston.

Ortiz said that former Bulger associate Stephen “The Rifleman” Flemmi had tried the same legal tactic, taking his claims all the way to the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston, which ruled against him. Flemmi had used the tactic in a case in which he was charged with extortion and racketeering.

She said, “Regardless of what representations [Bulger] may claim law enforcement made, there’s a particular case in the First Circuit, the Flemmi case, in which that same defense, I believe, was asserted a number of years ago. And the First Circuit held that being an informant, in and of itself, and certain representations by law enforcement agents does not provide sufficient or adequate immunity.”

Bulger’s lead attorney, J.W. Carney Jr., declined on Tuesday to respond to Ortiz’s remarks.

Carney said Monday that he intends to file a motion to dismiss all charges in a sweeping indictment against Bulger, which alleges that he participated in 19 murders, on the grounds that a “representative of the federal government” granted the gangster immunity for crimes he may have committed or intended to commit.

Carney also said Bulger’s immunity agreement is different from the one that Flemmi claimed to have, but he did not elaborate. Carney has not said who offered immunity to Bulger, but he pledged to identify that person in the dismissal motion.

In a separate filing Monday in US District Court in Boston, Bulger’s lawyers wrote that the immunity agreement “fully protects the defendant from prosecution for all of the crimes currently under indictment.” The indictment spans more than 20 years dating back to the 1970s.

William P. Callahan, a former federal prosecutor, said he doubts Bulger’s immunity argument will stand up in court.

“What Bulger has at best is a rogue [federal] agent patting him on the head and saying, ‘Hey, you’ve got immunity,’” said Callahan, who now runs Unitel, a New York-based security and investigative firm.

He said that in the federal system, only a judge can sign off on a US attorney’s request to grant someone immunity, and he is not aware of any cases in which informants were given carte blanche to commit future crimes.

“I’ve only heard about it being in the present and past tense,” Callahan said. “I’ve never heard of future immunity, not in recent years. Now maybe a long time ago, [but] I can’t imagine that happening, blanket immunity to go out and commit murder.”

Callahan said he cannot imagine any prosecutor making such an offer, but it is theoretically possible.

“Let’s take a rabbit out of a hat here and say [Bulger has] some crazy US attorney who said something and they can prove it,” Callahan said. “Then you might have some smoke.”

Relatives of Bulger’s alleged victims scoffed at the gangster’s immunity claim on Monday after a hearing on the case.

Carney is also seeking to have US District Court Judge Richard G. Stearns, the presiding judge on the case, recuse himself.

Stearns was a top prosecutor in the US attorney’s office during part of the period of the indictment, and Carney has indicated he may want to call him as a witness to ask about issues related to the immunity deal.

Trial is to begin March 4.

Also Tuesday, Stearns allowed The Boston Globe to intervene as a party seeking to lift a court order sealing discovery evidence in the case. He referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler for a report and recommendation, court records show.

Martin Finucane of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Brian R. Ballou can be reached at bballou@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter at @globeballou. Travis Andersen can be reached at tandersen@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @TAGlobe.