Accused mobster, near death, denies ties to Boston art heist-lawyer
An accused
mobster on what may be his death bed once again denied knowing anything
about the whereabouts of paintings stolen from a Boston museum in the
largest art heist in U.S. history, his lawyer said on Saturday.
Robert
Gentile, 80, faces charges of selling a loaded firearm to a convicted
killer. His attorney contends the case was brought to pressure him into
leading federal agents to paintings stolen from Boston's Isabella
Stewart Gardner Museum in 1990.
Attorney
Ryan McGuigan said he visited Gentile in South Carolina this week after
being advised by federal officials to tell Gentile's wife, also 80 and
in ill health, and son, in his early 50s, to prepare for the possibility
of the man's death.
"I
told him that if there ever was a time to give up some information that
you haven't yet, that I don't know, this would be it," McGuigan said in a
phone interview. He said he believed that if Gentile were to offer up
new information about the paintings, federal officials would allow him
to see his family in Connecticut.
"He said, 'Yeah, but there's no
painting,'" McGuigan said. "His story has never changed in the six years
that I have represented him."
A
spokesman for federal prosecutors in Connecticut declined to comment.
McGuigan said he could not provide more detail on where Gentile is being
held.
Gentile had been
due to stand trial last month on the gun charge, but his failing health
delayed proceedings. He has repeatedly denied knowing the whereabouts of
any of the art taken in one of the longest-unsolved high-profile crimes
in Boston.
The
theft was carried out by two men dressed in police uniforms who
apparently overpowered a night security guard who had buzzed them in a
back entrance. None of the 13 artworks, which include Rembrandt's "Storm
on the Sea of Galilee" and Vermeer's "The Concert," has been recovered.
Due
to a quirk in Gardner's will, the empty frames that held the paintings
remain on the walls of the museum she built to house the collection she
amassed with her husband.
The
art must be displayed the way it was during her lifetime, preventing
curators from hanging new works and leaving a constant reminder of the
theft.
At a court hearing last year,
federal prosecutors said Gentile was secretly recorded telling an
undercover FBI agent he had access to at least two of the paintings and
could sell them for $500,000 each.
A
2012 FBI search of Gentile's home turned up a handwritten list of the
stolen art, its estimated value and police uniforms, according to court
documents.
Art Hostage Comments:
What Bobby Gentile's Lawyer, Attorney
Ryan McGuigan, fails to reveal is the signed deal he has with his client Bobby Gentile, giving him personally at least 40% of the $5 million reward if the Gardner paintings are ever recovered.
Bobby Gentile knows this full well and therefore, he might pass away without revealing what he actually knows about the whereabouts of the Gardner art.
However, I am sure Bobby Gentile has made provisions for his nearest and dearest to have those facts, so they may be in a position to utilise them after Bobby Gentile leaves this mortal coil.
Whether the remaining members of the Gentile family are bound by the signed agreement between Bobby Gentile and Attorney
Ryan McGuigan remains to be seen, but the 40% plus demands of Attorney
Ryan McGuigan could be counter productive and be the very reason why Bobby Gentile, or his family would not be willing to expose themselves to Law Enforcement scrutiny in pursuit of the Gardner art reward.
Empty frame at Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum (CBS)
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — A reputed Connecticut mobster who authorities
believe has information about the largest art heist in U.S. history
remains hospitalized after being injured in jail, and his trial on
weapons charges has been postponed.
A lawyer for Robert Gentile
of Manchester said Friday that Gentile remains hospitalized “in bad
shape” after he fell last month at the Wyatt Detention Facility in
Central Falls, Rhode Island.
The lawyer, A. Ryan McGuigan, says jury selection that was scheduled
to begin Tuesday in federal court in Hartford has been postponed
indefinitely.
A tent set up by the FBI outside Robert Gentile’s home on May 2, 2016.
Prosecutors believe Gentile knows something about the still-unsolved,
1990 theft of $500 million worth of artwork from Boston’s Isabella
Stewart Gardner Museum, because another gangster’s widow claimed her
husband gave Gentile two of the paintings.
Gentile has denied knowing anything about the theft.
Notorious Boston mobster-turned-pastor has clues about Gardner heist
By Stephen Kurkjian and Shelley Murphy
Globe Correspondent | Globe Staff
MEMPHIS – A notorious Boston mobster who disappeared into the
federal witness protection program has resurfaced in Tennessee with a
new identity, a new life, and a tantalizing clue involving the world’s
largest art heist.
In this city on the Mississippi, he’s known as
Alonso Esposito, a tall, charismatic man with graying hair and a Boston
accent who self-published a paperback about the Bible and volunteers as a
pastor at a nondenominational church.
But in the 1990s, as Mafia capo Robert “Bobby” Luisi Jr., he ran a
crew of wiseguys, based in Greater Boston, that included two men
suspected by the FBI of stashing $500 million worth of masterworks
stolen from Boston’s Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in 1990.
In a
series of interviews from his Memphis home, the 55-year-old Luisi
revealed that one of those associates, Robert “Unc” Guarente, told him
years ago that the stolen Gardner paintings were buried beneath a home
in Florida.
The two were alone in the late 1990s at a Waltham
apartment they used as a “safehouse,” watching a television segment
about the Gardner theft, according to Luisi, when Guarente confided that
he knew where the artwork was. In Florida, he said, under a concrete
floor.
“He wanted to know if I knew where we could sell it,” Luisi said.
Luisi, who was running a lucrative cocaine trafficking ring at the time
and involved in a bloody turf war with rival mobsters, said he told
Guarente that he didn’t know anybody who could fence stolen artwork.
“I knew I couldn’t move it,” Luisi said. “I didn’t want to get involved in it.”
Guarente,
who died in 2004 at age 64, never offered the precise Florida location
where the masterworks were supposedly buried, according to Luisi, and
the pair never discussed it again.
Luisi said he told FBI agents
about Guarente’s claim in 2012 when they visited him in prison, where he
was serving 15 years for cocaine trafficking. He said they questioned
him about the possibility that Guarente and another mobster, Robert “The
Cook” Gentile, tried to sell the stolen artwork in Philadelphia years
earlier.
An FBI spokeswoman declined to comment on Luisi’s account
or whether it prompted any digging in Florida for the stolen
masterpieces, citing the ongoing investigation focused on recovering the
artwork. A year after the FBI interview, Luisi finished his prison term
and entered witness protection in exchange for testifying against a
former Boston mob associate.
Karen Pulfer Focht for The Boston Globe
Alonso Esposito prayed with the congregation at Faith Keepers Ministry in Memphis on June 26.
The Gardner theft remains unsolved decades after two men
dressed as police officers talked their way into the elegant museum on
the Fenway shortly after midnight on March 18, 1990, tied up two guards
and disappeared with 13 masterworks. None have been recovered, despite a
$5 million reward and promises of immunity. They include three
Rembrandts — including his only seascape, “Storm on the Sea of Galilee” —
and a Vermeer.
In 2013, the FBI announced it was confident it had
identified the two thieves, both now deceased, but declined to name
them, citing the ongoing investigation. Gentile, 80, is in jail while
awaiting trial on federal gun charges.
Authorities said they
believed some of the artwork changed hands through organized crime
circles, and moved from Boston to Connecticut and Philadelphia, where
the trail went cold in 2003.
‘I am certain that we’d have noticed if we’d come across anything valuable, like paintings by Rembrandt.’
Robert Thornley, on the home his company demolished
Sitting in the kitchen of his ranch-style home on a quiet
street with manicured lawns, Luisi, who was affiliated with the
Philadelphia mob family, spoke freely in late June about his notorious
past and about the dream of a new life that prompted him to leave the
safe haven of the witness protection program.
“I’m just not
afraid,” said Luisi, who said he wanted to come out of hiding so he
could promote his ministry and religious book, The Last Generation. “My
faith is so strong in God.”
Luisi, who grew up in Boston’s North
End and East Boston, has his own website, alonsoesposito.com, and is on
YouTube and Facebook. He’s also working on an autobiography, “From Capo
to Christian,” and said he hopes his transformation might inspire
others.
Luisi’s path from Mafioso to government witness was a
tortured one. After his 1999 arrest on drug charges, he agreed to
cooperate against mobsters from Boston to Philadelphia and confessed to
ordering the 1997 murder of a rival Boston gangster.
But Luisi changed his mind about cooperating and was sentenced to 15 years and eight months in prison for cocaine trafficking.
Luisi
said he was, nevertheless, happy to talk to the FBI about the Gardner.
He said he told them that Gentile, of Manchester, Conn., never discussed
the stolen artwork with him, but as a soldier in the Philadelphia
family, Gentile would have had the authority to negotiate a deal with
organized crime figures in that city.
The FBI has searched Guarente’s property in Maine, and Gentile’s property in Connecticut, repeatedly.
During
a brief telephone conversation, Guarente’s widow, Elene, said she was
unaware of any Florida property connected to her husband, “but he was
always traveling one place or another without telling me where he was
going.”
Maine State Police records indicate that Guarente listed a
lakeside home in Orlando as his residence for several years in the
early 1990s. The single-family home, built on a concrete slab in 1980,
was torn down in 2007.
“I am certain that we’d have noticed if
we’d come across anything valuable, like paintings by Rembrandt,” said
Robert Thornley, whose company did the demolition.
A developer,
John Gigliotti, who removed an underground pool from the property last
year, said he didn’t turn up anything memorable during the excavation.
Karen Pulfer Focht for The Boston Globe
Esposito checked himself in a mirror before leaving for church.
Federal authorities have been focusing on Gentile since 2010,
when Elene Guarente told the FBI that her husband gave two of the stolen
paintings to Gentile during a rendezvous in Maine before his death.
Gentile,
80, was ensnared in an FBI sting last year and is scheduled to stand
trial Sept. 13 in Hartford on the gun charges. He insists he doesn’t
know anything about the stolen artwork, though he acknowledged in a 2014
Globe interview that he and Guarente talked about trying to recover the
paintings so they could collect the reward.
But, a federal
prosecutor revealed in court that Gentile last year offered to sell the
paintings for $500,000 each to an undercover FBI agent. He also flunked a
polygraph exam when he denied that he knew about plans to rob the
Gardner museum beforehand and when he denied that he had the paintings
or knew where they were, according to the prosecutor.
“He is a
sick old man and in my opinion showing signs of dementia,” said
Gentile’s attorney, A. Ryan McGuigan. “He sincerely wishes the paintings
to be returned to the museum, but he simply had no information as to
their whereabouts.”
Brian T. Kelly, a former federal prosecutor
who worked on the Gardner theft investigation until 2013 and is now a
partner at Nixon Peabody, declined to comment on information provided by
Luisi, but said, “He certainly would be in a good position to know
about the Guarente crew, as well as the Philly mob.”
The New
England Mafia was in disarray in the 1990s, battered by prosecutions and
a violent power struggle between warring factions. Luisi was even
feuding with his own father, Robert Luisi Sr., who was shot to death by
two rivals in 1995 in the infamous 99 Restaurant massacre in
Charlestown, along with Luisi’s brother, cousin and another man.
Luisi
said his bid to become a “made man” in the New England Mafia was
blocked by a capo. In a rare and bold move, Luisi asked to join the
Philadelphia family, which made him a capo in 1998 and let him operate
his cocaine trafficking business out of Boston in exchange for tribute.
Luisi’s goal was to create his own family in Boston, with Guarente as his underboss and Gentile as his consigliere.
Luisi
said he was staying at the Waltham “safehouse” with Guarente on
weekdays in the late 1990s, when he introduced him to Gentile, and that
Gentile frequently stayed there and did the cooking. Guarente and Luisi
used the two-story townhouse to hide from their mob rivals before going
home for weekends.
When Luisi was released from prison in 2013,
he was placed in the witness protection program in exchange for
testifying later that year against Enrico Ponzo, a former Boston mob
associate.
Luisi described himself at the trial as a man who had
found God in March 1998, but said he felt he couldn't shed his mob ties
at that time.
“How could you go out and say, ‘I’m with Christ,’” Luisi said in an interview. “They’ll kill me.”
Luisi
credits God with leading him to his new life in Tennessee, where he
settled three years ago. He has a new wife, Julie, a mother of three who
works as an IT manager. She said she was flabbergasted, but undaunted
when Luisi revealed his past on their second date. She married him 21
months ago and calls him the love of her life.
Prophet Gerald
Coleman Sr., the bishop at Faith Keepers Ministries in Memphis, which
has about 300 members, said he has known Luisi for more than a year and
felt comfortable making him a pastor at the church several months ago.
“He’s
told me something of his past but I know I don’t know everything bad
that happened with him,” Coleman said. “But I do know that he is a man
of God who has studied God’s word.”
Coleman, who was impressed by
Luisi’s 210-page book, “The Last Generation,” said, “I consider myself a
good judge of character, and everything I see with Alonso tells me he
wants to serve this church and its members and he has our interests
closest to his heart.”
Luisi said he began working on the book
when he was still in prison, earning his theology diploma online and
teaching Bible courses to fellow inmates.
And even though Luisi
said he wants his past identity to be known, so people understand his
journey, he plans on keeping his new name.
“I like Alonso a lot better than I like Bobby,” he said. “He’s a much better person.”
Guns Found In 3rd FBI
Search Of Mobster's Manchester Home; Mystery Of Missing Art Remains
Federal agentsfound more guns — including a machine gun — during a search
earlier this week of Robert Gentile's house, giving law enforcement more to use
as pressure against an aging gangster many believe holds the key to learning
the fate of a half billion dollars in missing art, sources said. A caravan of FBI agents descended on Gentile's suburban ranch in Manchester
Monday, searching behind walls and cutting open oil tanks in the hunt for clues
to a fortune in rare art that vanished mysteriously 26 years ago after a
midnight heist at Boston's Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. What the agents found was not art, but a Mac 11 machine gun, a .22 caliber
handgun, a small Walther handgun, a silencer, ammunition and what was
inexplicably noted on a law enforcement report as a piece of wood. The
purported target of the search warrant was the art — 13 masterpieces including
two Rembrandts and a Vermeer stolen by thieves disguised as police officers,
one of the sources said. The U.S. attorney's office said it will not discuss the search. Gentile's
lawyer, A. Ryan McGuigan, said it is part of the FBI's effort to pressure
Gentile into providing information about the missing art — information the
lawyer said Gentile does not have.
It was the third time FBI agents searched Gentile's home
over the last four years, hauling away truckloads of items that included a list
of the stolen Gardner pieces with corresponding black market values, cash,
drugs, a rare stuffed kestrel and a pair of enormous elephant tusks. Agents
found guns and ammunition during each search, causing a judge, after one of the
searches, to exclaim that the tidy little home on Frances Drive contained
"a veritable arsenal."
Gentile — overweight, in declining health and confined to a wheelchair — is
being held in a federal jail outside Providence while awaiting trial in July on
charges that he sold a gun and ammunition to a convicted three-time murderer. The newest search is certain to lead to new charges and additional prison
time if he is convicted. As a previously convicted felon, Gentile faces
enhanced sentencing if convicted of a weapons possession charge. Gentile has been a law enforcement target since 2010, when the widow of a
fellow gangster said she was present when her husband gave two of the stolen
Gardner paintings to Gentile before his death about six or seven years earlier.
The unexpected admission made Gentile, until then viewed by law enforcement as
an unremarkable Hartford swindler, the subject of extraordinary law enforcement
pressure. Since 2010, information from a variety of sources, including Gentile's own
words in secret FBI surveillance recordings, has contributed to an
investigative theory that Gentile is a member of a dwindling number of aging
New England gangsters who had some association with the art after the March 18,
1990, heist.
FBI search does not uncover stolen Gardner paintings, attorney says
MANCHESTER, Conn. — The FBI did not recover any of the 13 masterworks
stolen from Boston’s Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum during a search
Monday of a Connecticut mobster’s home and an old oil drum buried in his
yard, according to the man’s lawyer. However, after ripping up
carpeting, wall paneling, and part of the ceiling in Robert Gentile’s
ranch-style house on Frances Drive, agents found several guns,
ammunition, and a silencer, according to several people familiar with
the search. The discovery could lead to new charges against 80-year-old Gentile,
who has been identified by authorities as a person of interest in the
heist. He is in jail awaiting trial in July in federal court in
Hartford on charges of selling a gun to a convicted felon. “I
spoke to my client today and, again, he has no information about any
paintings,” Gentile’s attorney, A. Ryan McGuigan, said Tuesday. A
search warrant provided to Gentile’s wife, who was at home during the
search, indicated the FBI was looking for the 13 pieces of artwork
stolen from the Gardner Museum in 1990 and also for firearms, McGuigan
said. “As far as I can tell, they found nothing from the Gardner Museum,”
said McGuigan, noting that none of the artwork was included on an
inventory list provided to the Gentiles following the search. Kristen Setera, a spokeswoman for the FBI’s Boston office, declined to comment Tuesday on the search or what led to it. It was the third search by the FBI of Gentile’s home since 2012.
According to McGuigan, during Monday’s day-long search agents pulled up
carpeting, tore paneling from the walls in the basement, cut holes into
studs throughout the house and removed portions of the ceiling. “The house is torn apart,” McGuigan said. “This has been a four-year odyssey with no foreseeable end.” The
FBI also dug up an old oil tank next to Gentile’s house. Agents were
observed lowering a camera inside the tank on Monday in an apparent
effort to determine whether anything was hidden inside. A neighbor said the Gentiles disposed of the tank after they converted their home from oil to natural gas about 10 years ago. A
prosecutor revealed in court earlier this year that authorities believe
Gentile knows the whereabouts of the $500 million worth of masterworks
stolen from the Gardner Museum because he has been plotting for more
than a decade to try to sell them. Two men disguised as police
officers talked their way into the museum on Boston’s Fenway in the
early morning hours of March 18, 1990, tied up two guards, and
disappeared with 13 masterworks. They include three works by Rembrandt, a
Vermeer, a Manet, and a Flinck. In January, a federal prosecutor
told a judge in Connecticut that Gentile told at least three people he
had access to the paintings. McGuigan said Gentile was “just pretending” to have the paintings. Federal
prosecutors have alleged that Gentile offered to sell the paintings to
an undercover FBI agent, who was posing as a drug dealer, for $500,000
apiece in 2015, but that deal collapsed. As a result of that sting,
Gentile was charged with the weapons charge he is now facing. The
FBI began focusing on Gentile in 2009 when the wife of another person of
interest in the theft, Robert Guarente, told agents that her late
husband gave two of the stolen paintings to Gentile before he died in
2004, according to the government. Gentile flunked a polygraph in
2012 when the FBI asked if he knew about plans to rob the Gardner
Museum beforehand and whether he had possession of the stolen paintings
or knew where they were, a prosecutor said in court. However,
McGuigan has said that if Gentile knew where the paintings were, he
would return them and collect the $5 million reward being offered by the
museum for their safe recovery. One of Gentile’s neighbors said Tuesday that she was annoyed by the disruption caused by the latest search. “This
is a big waste of taxpayer money,” said the neighbor, Linda Gilbert,
who had been on hand when the FBI arrived and raided Gentile’s home
twice before. She first thought the commotion Monday was a wedding, then
realized it was another visit from the FBI. “Just leave these
people alone. They’re elderly. Just stop,” she said, adding she was
particularly concerned about Gentile’s elderly wife. “I feel sorry for
her because this is the third time now. Something like this could make
the poor lady have a heart attack.’’ FBI Searching Mobster
Robert Gentile's Manchester Home
Numerous
unmarked law enforcement vehicles surrounded the Frances Drive home of reputed
gangster Robert Gentile. Authorities suspect Gentile has information about the
irreplaceable art that vanished in a sensational theft from Boston's Isabella
Stewart Gardner Museum.
FBI
Searching CT Home Of Mobster Tied To Gardner Museum Case
MANCHESTER
– FBI agents Monday were at the
home of gangster Robert "Bobby the Cook" Gentile, the top person of
interest in the quarter-century effort to recover masterpieces stolen from
Boston's Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum.
Agents
set up a tent in the front yard of the Frances Drive home, where they have
previous spent time digging. Local police blocked off the street, where Gentile
owns a small brown ranch.
Agents
arrived in about 15 cars, with two search dogs and three trucks with heavy
equipment. The U.S. Attorney's office in Connecticut had no comment on the
search.
Gentile's
lawyer, Ryan McGuigan, said FBI has not showed him a warrant or give him a
reason for the search.
Gentile
is currently facing a federal gun charge that he claims the FBI contrived to
force him to reveal the location of $500 million in masterworks.
In
January, federal prosecutor John H. Durham recited in court some of the
evidence collected by the FBI team working the baffling robbery at the Gardner
Museum.
Ryan
McGuigan, attorney for Robert Gentile, discusses the FBI search of his client's
home.
Durham
said Gentile, 79, and mob partner Robert Guarente tried, but failed, to use the
return of two stolen Gardner pieces to obtain a reduction in a prison sentence
imposed on a Guarente associate. Durham revealed no additional detail, but
knowledgeable sources said the beneficiary of the effort was to have been David
Turner, who is serving 38 years for conspiring to rob an armored car.
While he
was confined in a federal prison in Rhode Island on drug and gun charges in
2013 and 2014, Durham said, Gentile told at least three people that he had
knowledge of the stolen Gardner art.
Durham
confirmed a Courant report that Guarente's wife told Gardner investigators
early in 2015 that her husband once had possession of stolen Gardner art and
transferred two paintings to Gentile before Guarente died from cancer in 2004.
Also,
Durham said Gardner investigators had reason to suspect Gentile since 2015,
when he submitted to a polygraph examination and denied having advance
knowledge of the Gardner heist, ever possessing a Gardner painting or knowing
the location of any of the stolen paintings. The result showed a likelihood of
less than 0.1 percent that he was truthful. Gentile claims the examination was
conducted improperly.
On the
night of March 18, 1990, two thieves disguised as Boston police officers
entered the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum and stole 13 works of art valued at
about $500 million. The FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office continue to
investigate, and the museum offers a $5 million reward for information leading
to the artworks' recovery.
MANCHESTER — The FBI is once again investigating at the home
of reputed mobster Robert Gentile. Gentile is suspected of having
knowledge about the largest art heist in U.S. history.
Monday
afternoon FBI agents and Manchester Police Dept. blocked off the street
at Frances Drive and Niles Drive. There is no word yet on how long they
will be out there.
Robert Gentile claimed federal authorities entrapped him into
illegally selling a gun to pressure him into cooperating in the
investigation of the 1990 theft at Boston’s Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. In January, he lost a bid to get his weapons case dismissed.
One of the paintings stolen from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in 1990
Thirteen pieces of art worth an estimated $500 million were stolen
and never recovered, including paintings by Rembrandt and Edouard Manet.
No one has been arrested.
Gentile denies knowing anything about the missing artwork.
Federal prosecutors said they have evidence Gentile has told others he has access to some of the paintings for potential sales.
Here we are after 26 years still awaiting the recovery of the Gardner art.
Trust needs to be established and demonstrated by all sides.
Dispense with the guarded, broad brush offers, lets see all the cards put on the table once and for all.
Those with the ability to recover the Gardner art lay out clearly what they want to allow the Gardner art to surface.
Those in authority need to publicly set out the terms and conditions of the immunity deal, clearly and with transparency.
The reward offer by the Museum needs to be laid out in specific detail, a tarriff list of exactly how much for each and every stolen Gardner artwork.
The reward was raised back in 1997 from $1 million to $5 million, thats nearly twenty years ago, so time for another look at the amount, consider raising the amount, doubling the amount?
A trial run of a lesser valued Gardner artwork being recovered to test the waters and see how sincere all sides are in reality.
If a lesser Gardner artwork can be recovered and payments made to those providing the location of recovery and who have had nothing to do with the actual heist or subsequant handling of the Gardner art, no arrests, then that would be a foundation to build upon.
The Gardner Museum Heist: Who’s Got the Art?
Twenty-six years after the artwork was stolen,
the museum’s security chief thinks he knows who did it. What has him
stumped is where the paintings are now.
Sometimes, when Anthony Amore gets frustrated by his 11-year hunt for
the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum’s stolen paintings, he and the FBI
agents on the case will talk each other through the ways that other
museums’ stolen masterpieces have come home.
If the 13 Gardner artworks swiped in 1990 are ever returned, will it
be thanks to an old crook, ready to deal at last? A family member,
sorting through inherited bric-a-brac in some long-locked New England
attic? Or a tip from the public, someone who sees or hears a final clue?
“We often say, ‘When will one of those scenarios come our way?’” says
Amore, the Gardner’s director of security since 2005. But after more
than a decade of searching, after compiling 30,000 pieces of information
about the crime, he no longer feels the homecoming is so far away.
“One small piece of information could end this tomorrow,” Amore says.
The biggest art theft in world history struck Boston 26 years ago
this week, on March 18, 1990, when two thieves dressed as police bluffed
their way into the Gardner and made off with masterpieces by Rembrandt,
Vermeer, and Manet.
Though a generation has passed, the investigation is no cold case.
Amore and the FBI marked the heist’s 23rd and 25th anniversaries by
sharing their leading theory of the case—a tale of petty thieves in
Dorchester and Mafia men in Connecticut and Philadelphia. This year, as
the 26th anniversary of the theft approached, Amore sat down with Boston for a more forward-looking conversation: on how the case might end.
None of his comments, Amore stressed, were intended as hints about
specific suspects. “I don’t want you to think I’m making a commentary on
the Gardner criminals in detail,” he said. “For instance, his name’s in
the paper all the time: Robert Gentile.” A federal prosecutor has
alleged that Gentile, a 79-year-old alleged Connecticut mobster, may
have some of the paintings in his possession. “I don’t want you to think
I’m trying to tie Robert Gentile to these profiles.”
In his publicity photos, Amore, 49, looks like the federal
counter-terror agent he once was, sharp and polished in a suit and tie.
The day of our interview, he chose a more bookish look, including a
fleece pullover and glasses. He’s tackled parts of his work more like an
art historian than a federal investigator: he’s collected the details
of 1,300 art heists from around the world. Though the Gardner hired
Amore 15 years after the thefts, they have come to define his work; he
carries a copy of one of the 13 lost pieces, Rembrandt’s etching “Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man,”
in his wallet as a reminder of the crime. Amore spoke about how past
art heists may hold clues about both the thieves who robbed the Gardner
and the prospects for cracking the case, as well as ways the public
might help.
An hour after the end of St. Patrick’s Day 1990, a merrymaking band
of students walked past the Gardner Museum and noticed something odd:
two men in police uniforms, sitting in an unmarked hatchback. One
student noticed the car didn’t have a police license plate, but he and
his friends, not wanting to get busted for underage drinking, moved on.
At 1:24 a.m., the car pulled up to the museum’s employee entrance.
One of the uniformed men pressed the buzzer, told guard Richard Abath
they were investigating a disturbance, and convinced Abath to let them
in.
Hours later, Abath and a second guard were found in the basement,
handcuffed and tied up with duct tape. Missing were 13 works of art,
five of them by Edgar Degas and three by Rembrandt van Rijn, including
Rembrandt’s only known seascape, “Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee.”
“People say this was so elaborate,” Amore says. “It’s not elaborate!”
If Abath had followed protocol and called the Boston police, the fake
cops would never have gotten into the Gardner. “It was kind of a flimsy
plan that worked.”
The thieves’ haul included Johannes Vermeer’s masterpiece “The Concert”—“the
most valuable stolen thing in the world,” Amore claims, with a value as
high as $200 million. But their other choices have helped convince
Amore that, like nearly all art thieves in history, they were common
criminals, not experts in art crime. The thieves left behind the
Gardner’s most valuable painting, Titian’s “Europa,” but took a Napoleonic finial, a gilded bronze eagle, off a French flagstaff.
“The idea of a professional art thief, a cat burglar who goes and
steals masterpieces, is fiction,” says Amore. “It has nothing to do with
people who want art for their collection. It’s people stealing these
things for money.”
In 2011, Amore spun off his historic art-crime research into his book Stealing Rembrandts,
co-authored with journalist Tom Mashberg. Hardly any thieves who steal a
masterpiece ever do it again, Amore says, because they quickly discover
they’re stuck with it. “If you steal hugely recognizable art, you can’t
fence it,” Amore says.
In fact, Amore only knows of two thieves in history who stole art
more than once. One was Adam Worth, a 19th-century crook who inspired
the character of Sherlock Holmes’ archenemy, Professor Moriarty. The
other is Massachusetts’ master art burglar, Myles Connor, who stole a
Rembrandt from Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts in 1975, then used it to
negotiate a reduced sentence for stealing N.C. Wyeth and Andrew Wyeth
paintings from the Woolworth estate in Maine the year before.
“He’s the greatest art thief who’s ever lived,” says Amore. However,
he adds, “Myles Connor did not rob the Gardner Museum. If Myles wasn’t
in prison at the time, it would have to have been him. But we know it
was not him.” Connor has sometimes bragged that he inspired the Gardner
heist, claiming that associates of his pulled off his tentative plans to
rob the place. Yet Connor’s late-1990s offers to try to find the
missing paintings all came to naught. Amore, who’s met Connor, shrugs
off his claims. “I do feel confident that if he had access to them
today, we’d have them back.”
The thieves’ ruse of dressing as policemen was common in
Massachusetts robberies around 1990. So Amore says he wants to hear tips
from “people who might know a criminal who could’ve been involved, who
used these sorts of ruses”—for instance, a crook who owned a police
uniform. “We’re looking for who the mastermind of the theft might’ve
been,” he says.
But what Amore wants even more is a tip that leads to the paintings,
not the thieves. On the 23rd anniversary of the theft in 2013, FBI
agents, with Amore at their side, announced
that they believed “with a high degree of confidence” that they had
identified the thieves, and that the paintings had been passed to
organized crime figures in Connecticut and Philadelphia. Last year,
before the 25th anniversary, Amore and the lead FBI agent on the
investigation shared more about their theory of the case. It revolves around the late Carmello Merlino, a mobbed-up Dorchester car-repair shop owner, and his associates, including George Reissfelder and Leonard DiMuzio.
Both Reissfelder and DiMuzio died in 1991, and both resembled police
sketches of the thieves. Reissfelder drove a red Dodge Daytona, similar
to the car the students saw outside the Gardner.
“We’ve said in the past we know who the thieves are,” Amore says, but “knowing that hasn’t led us directly to the paintings.”
For years, the Gardner has offered a $5 million reward for
information that leads to the safe return of the 13 artworks in good
condition. Last year, it announced a separate $100,000 reward for the
Napoleonic bronze eagle, on the possibility that it may have been
separated from the paintings since the theft. “It may have been stolen
as a trophy piece,” Amore says. “Someone could have that in their home
right now, or in their antique store.” According to a January story in the Hartford Courant,
the eagle may have been seen years ago at Robert Gentile’s used car lot
in Connecticut. (Amore won’t comment on that report. “I don’t want to
give it too much or too little credibility,” he says.)
Tips about the Gardner art’s whereabouts have been few and sketchy.
“That kind of tells us they haven’t moved around a lot,” Amore says.
Rembrandt’s “Christ in the Storm on the Sea of Galilee” was offered for
sale in Philadelphia around 2003, according to an FBI witness. A federal
prosecutor in Hartford has claimed in court
that Gentile tried to sell some of the Gardner paintings to an
undercover FBI agent last year; Gentile’s lawyer has said his client was
bluffing and doesn’t have the paintings.
“People assume that because a quarter-century has passed, those
things are long gone,” Amore says. Not necessarily. “Whoever the
paintings went to could still be in possession of all or some of them.”
In May 1980, Boston violin virtuoso Roman Totenberg lost his
Stradivarius to a thief. After performing in a concert at the Longy
School of Music in Cambridge, Totenberg, the school’s director, left his
prized 1734 violin in his office to attend a reception. It was gone
when he returned. Totenberg, the father of NPR correspondent Nina
Totenberg, died in 2012 at age 101, without seeing the violin again.
After 35 years, the Stradivarius came back. Violinist Philip S.
Johnson, a longtime suspect in the theft, left it to his ex-wife when he
died in 2011, and four years later, she brought it to an appraiser, who
recognized it as Totenberg’s. Last August, the FBI returned the violin to Nina Totenberg and her sisters during a ceremony at the U.S. Attorney’s office in Manhattan.
If a masterpiece violin can return home, so can masterpiece
paintings. Like Totenberg’s violin, Amore says, stolen art is often
recovered a generation after a theft. By then, “the scariest person
involved in the crime has died or is not so scary anymore,” he says.
“Now [someone] can come forward.”
Often, a tip from the public leads to the return of stolen art:
“Somebody who comes forward and says they’ve seen something, they’re
aware of something.” Such tips most often come from a friend or family
member of the person who has the art. “Unfortunately, it’s never a guy
who walks down the street and sees a painting through a window,” Amore
says. “These paintings are not hanging on people’s walls. They’re
hidden.”
Sometimes, a criminal informant provides the tip, or the person who
has the art cuts a deal. “Sometimes, stolen art is used to negotiate
your way out of trouble,” says Amore. “Some people will even steal them
ahead of time, to hold as a get-out-of-jail-free card.”
Like Totenberg’s Stradivarius, the Gardner’s artworks may have ended
up with someone who didn’t steal or hide them. “I would be concerned
some innocent person might have them right now,” Amore says, “and is
afraid to come forward because they fear some sort of danger from the
outside world.”
It’s a crime to knowingly possess stolen property, but the U.S.
Attorney’s office in Boston has offered the possibility of immunity for
anyone who helps return the Gardner’s art. Amore says the museum could
protect a tipster’s identity and deliver the $5 million reward
anonymously, through an attorney. Since he’s not a law-enforcement
agent, he adds, he can ensure the art’s return is completed without fear
of arrest.
“Speaking for the museum, we just want our paintings back,” Amore
says. “I would work as hard as can you can imagine to make sure that the
people who come forward, that their names are never exposed. We have
methods to do that, to pay the reward, so the person who gets it isn’t
named publicly.”
That raises the possibility that Boston’s greatest mystery could end
mysteriously, that Bostonians could someday see the lost paintings on
the Gardner’s gallery walls again, but without the whodunit thrill of
learning who stole and hid the paintings and how they came back. “When a
piece is recovered, oftentimes the info is murky and scarce,” says
Amore, “because there are parts of the story that just can’t be told.”
That’s okay with him. “I am far more interested in the recovery than the
story,” he says.
It’s also possible the Gardner mystery will never be solved. Perhaps
the artworks have been destroyed, or are too damaged for anyone to
collect the $5 million reward, or they’re lost—hidden by a crook who
died without revealing their location. But Amore doesn’t dwell on
worst-case scenarios. About 80 percent of stolen masterworks, he says,
are eventually returned.
“So many people are interested in the theft,” Amore says. “If people
want to help, they should acquaint themselves with the images. That’s
how this will be solved.” The Gardner’s website hosts a virtual tour of the stolen art, and images of each piece are posted on the FBI’s webpage about the case.
Any little bit of information can help. “I’m not looking for someone
necessarily to call me and say, ‘Go to Locker 3 in this storage
facility,’” he says. “It’s like you put this puzzle together, you start
with the borders, and people are giving you pieces.
“If you do puzzles, most of the time, there’s this one piece that’s
just like—hoo, okay!—now you hit this arc, now it’s falling together. So
I’m not necessarily looking for the big aha! moment. I’m looking for the small aha! moments that I can piece together.”
The government secretly reduced the prison term of a longtime suspect
in the 1990 robbery of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum several
years ago, raising questions about whether he agreed to help authorities
recover the $500 million worth of stolen masterworks.
David
Turner, who was sentenced to 38 years in prison for the 1999 attempted
robbery of an Easton armored car company and not scheduled for release
until at least 2032, is now expected to be freed in 2025, according to
the US Bureau of Prisons website.
The US attorney’s office, the FBI, and Turner’s lawyer, Robert
Goldstein, declined to comment on why, or even when, seven years were
shaved off Turner’s sentence.
It’s unclear whether the 48-year-old
Braintree native, who emerged as a suspect in the Gardner heist in the
early 1990s, provided any information to authorities in exchange for
leniency.
However, Turner’s possible involvement in the ongoing investigation
surfaced recently during federal court proceedings in Hartford involving
Robert Gentile, a Connecticut mobster who is awaiting trial on gun
charges and is suspected by the FBI of having access to the stolen
paintings.
In late 2010, Turner wrote a letter from prison to Gentile
instructing him to call Turner’s girlfriend. She then asked Gentile to
meet with two of Turner’s associates about recovering the stolen
artwork, according to Gentile’s lawyer.
Gentile, who was
cooperating with the FBI at the time, refused to meet with the pair and
introduce them to an FBI informant because of fear for his safety,
according to court filings.
A federal prosecutor disclosed last week in court that Gentile and
his friend Robert Guarente, who died in 2004, unsuccessfully tried to
negotiate the return of two stolen Gardner paintings in exchange for a
sentence reduction for one of Guarente’s associates. The associate, who
was not named in court, was Turner, according to two people familiar
with the incident.
When told of Turner’s sentence reduction,
Gentile’s lawyer, A. Ryan McGuigan, said in an interview, “I think it
means that he was cooperating with the federal government in trying to
aid them in gleaning information as to the whereabouts of the
paintings.”
He added that an inmate would generally have to
provide significant cooperation to get seven years knocked off a very
long sentence.
“Obviously, whatever [Turner] was offering didn’t
pan out because we’re in 2016 and we still don’t know where the
paintings are,” McGuigan said.
In 2013, the FBI announced it was
confident it had identified the thieves, but declined to name them,
citing the ongoing investigation. Authorities said they believed some of
the artwork changed hands through organized crime circles, and moved
from Boston to Connecticut and then to Philadelphia, where the trail
went cold. Later, the FBI said it believed the two thieves were dead.
Turner
is being held at the federal prison in Devens and could not be reached
for comment. However, in a 2013 e-mail to a Globe reporter he wrote,
“1st and foremost I have not, nor ever will cooperate with authorities.”
In
response to a request for an interview about his possible knowledge of
the whereabouts of the Gardner paintings, Turner wrote that he
distrusted reporters and added, “I am not a treasure hunter.”
The
Gardner heist was the largest art theft in history and remains one of
Boston’s most baffling mysteries. Two men dressed like police officers
talked their way into the museum in the early morning of March 18, 1990,
tied up two guards, and fled with 13 pieces of art.
The pieces, which include works by Rembrandt, Vermeer, Manet, and
Flinck, have never been recovered, despite a $5 million reward for
information leading to their safe return and promises of immunity.
After
Turner was arrested in 1999 in the attempted armored car company
robbery, along with Carmello Merlino, Stephen Rossetti, and William
Merlino, Turner claimed the FBI told him that it suspected he and
Merlino were involved in the Gardner theft and offered to let him “walk”
if he helped retrieve the stolen artwork.
Merlino, a Dorchester
auto repair shop owner with mob ties, was targeted by the FBI in 1997
after he boasted to two informants that he planned to recover the art
and collect the reward. He was convicted along with Turner and died in
prison in 2005.
Turner, who was also a suspect in three homicides, insisted at the
time of his arrest that he wasn’t involved in the heist and did not know
the whereabouts of the art. He was convicted in 2001 of attempting to
rob the armored car facility and a variety of other charges, including
carrying a hand grenade.
US District Judge Richard G. Stearns
sentenced Turner to 38 years and four months in 2003. He rejected
Turner’s claim that the FBI used informants to concoct the robbery plot
to entrap Turner and Merlino and force their cooperation in the Gardner
investigation. The judge rejected an additional request by Turner to
dismiss his conviction in 2009.
There are no details about
Turner’s sentence reduction on his criminal case docket in federal court
in Boston, indicating that records relating to the reduction are
sealed. A flurry of sealed documents were filed in Turner’s case in July
2011.
The only public record of Turner’s reduced sentence is the
Bureau of Prisons website, which adjusted Turner’s release date sometime
between 2010 and 2013.
A spokesman for the Bureau of Prisons said
he couldn’t provide information about the change in Turner’s release
date, but said any significant reduction in an inmate’s sentence could
be ordered only by the sentencing judge.
Significant sentence
reductions are “relatively rare,” said Ed Ross, the agency spokesman,
and can occur for statutory reasons such as the prisoner has attended a
residential drug treatment program, is deserving of “compassionate”
treatment, or that the prisoner has assisted investigators seeking to
solve a crime. Milton Valencia of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Murphy can be reached at shelley.murphy@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @shelley-murph. Kurkjian can be reached at Stephenkurkjian@gmail.com.
Here’s Why the FBI’s Gardner Museum Investigation Focused on Robert Gentile
The Hartford Courant conducted interviews with a Gentile associate who acted as an informant in a failed sting operation.
The 13 works of art taken from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum on
March 18, 1990 have been missing for more than two decades now, and for
the past few years, the FBI’s investigation has been largely focused on
one man—Robert Gentile.
A story published this week in the Hartford Courant,
based on interviews with a Gentile associate who was enlisted by the
FBI for a sting operation offers new details as to why authorities have
continued to pursue the Connecticut mobster in connection to the missing
museum works.
Sebastian “Sammy” Mozzicato was enlisted for the sting, executed in
2014, alongside his cousin and fellow Gentile associate Ronnie Bowes.
Mozzicato’s account in the Courant, corroborated by sources
close to the investigation, claims that Gentile has had access to the
missing art since the late 1990s.
Gentile was first implicated in the Gardner investigation in 2010,
based on a claim from the widow of Robert Guarante, a Boston mobster
whose Maine farmhouse authorities had scoured in search of the missing
artworks. The widow, Elene Guarante, told investigators that her husband
had two of the paintings in his possession, but had passed them on to
Gentile after a meeting in Portland, Maine.
The Courant reveals that Mozzicato told the FBI that in the
late 1990s, he had been assigned to move a package of what he thinks
were paintings between cars parked outside a condo in Waltham used by
Gentile, Guarante, and other members of their gang, a Boston sector of
the Philadelphia Mafia. He said that Gentile and Guarante then drove up
to Maine.
Among other things, Mozzicato also told the FBI that he heard Gentile
and Guarante discussing whether or not to give “a painting” as
“tribute” to one of their mob bosses in Philadelphia and that Gentile
once gave him photographs of five stolen paintings and instructed him to
recruit a buyer.
Additionally, Mozzicato also revealed that he and Bowes had on
numerous occasions seen what he believes is the gilded eagle that was
stolen from the Gardner, which served as a finial for a Napoleonic
flagstaff. He said he saw the object on a shelf at the used car business
Gentile used to own in South Windsor, Connecticut, and that he thinks
Gentile sold it at some point. Currently, the Gardner is offering a $100,000 reward for information leading to the recovery of the item, separate from the overall $5 million reward.
The sting, which is recounted in detail in the Courant ultimately
failed, with Gentile growing suspicious. He was arrested again in March
2015 and is currently awaiting trial on a weapons charge. While the FBI
has given him another opportunity to forgo a long prison sentence in
exchange for information about the art, Gentile maintains that he knows
nothing.
Prosecutors Reveal More Evidence They Say Ties Robert Gentile To Gardner Museum Robbery
Prosecutors Reveal More Evidence They Say Ties Robert Gentile To $500M Gardner Museum Robbery
HARTFORD — A federal prosecutor
revealed more evidence tying Hartford gangster Robert "Bobby the Cook"
Gentile to a notorious Boston art heist after Gentile claimed in court
Wednesday that he is being falsely accused and that the FBI contrived gun charges to force him to reveal the location of $500 million in masterworks.
The
government disclosures persuaded U.S. District Judge Robert N. Chatigny
to reject Gentile's argument that the weapons charges he faces should
be dismissed because they are the product of "outrageous government
misconduct."
During a strained hearing in Hartford, prosecutor John H. Durham
neutralized Gentile's misconduct claim with a rare recitation of some of
the evidence collected by the FBI team working the baffling robbery a
quarter century ago at Boston's Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum.
•Durham
said Gentile and mob partner Robert Guarente tried, but failed, to use
the return of two stolen Gardner pieces to obtain a reduction in a
prison sentence imposed on a Guarente associate. Durham revealed no
additional detail, but knowledgeable sources said the beneficiary of the
effort was to have been David Turner, who is serving 38 years for
conspiring to rob an armored car.
•While he was confined in a federal prison in Rhode
Island on drug and gun charges in 2013 and 2014, Durham said Gentile
told at least three people that he had knowledge of the stolen Gardner
art. Durham suggested in court that Gentile and one of the people
drafted some sort of contract involving the art, but would not elaborate
outside court.
•Durham
confirmed a Courant report that Guarente's wife told Gardner
investigators early in 2015 that her husband once had possession of
stolen Gardner art and transferred two paintings to Gentile before
Guarente died from cancer in 2004.
•Durham said Gardner
investigators had reason to suspect Gentile since 2015, when he
submitted to a polygraph examination and denied having advance knowledge
of the Gardner heist, ever possessing a Gardner painting or knowing the
location of any of the stolen paintings. The result showed a likelihood
of less than 0.1 percent that he was truthful. Gentile claims the
examination was conducted improperly.
Chatigny's speedy ruling from the bench Wednesday was a blow to
Gentile, 79, who is accused of two weapons charges for selling a gun to a
friend and associate who had been convicted of three murders. The
associate was one of two men the FBI recruited to join the Gardner
investigators as confidential informants.
Gentile claims he was
duped into selling the gun by federal prosecutors and FBI agents who
wanted to use weapons charges and the prospect of a long prison sentence
to leverage him into helping them recover the missing art. In spite of
Durham's claims, Gentile denies knowing anything about the robbery or
what became of the art.
"It is my client's contention that if he
did commit a crime, he was cajoled to do it by two government agents,"
A. Ryan McGuigan argued.
McGuigan described Gentile as a tired old
man who was trying to live out his final years in peace and quiet when
two old friends began goading him to commit crimes, one of which was
selling a gun. Gentile, white haired and overweight, was seated next to
his lawyer in a prison wheelchair and nodded in agreement.
But
Durham blasted the notion of Gentile as a suburban retiree, eking out an
existence on a monthly Social Security check. It was Gentile, Durham
said, who pressed the informants to commit crimes. Almost as soon as he
was released from a prison sentence in 2014, Durham said Gentile — who
the government claims is a sworn mafia soldier — was looking for help
unloading truckloads of hijacked cigarettes.
During his first
meeting with the informants, Durham said Gentile, who has not been
charged in the museum heist, was bragging that the FBI had failed to
confiscate all of his guns during an earlier search of his suburban
ranch home in Manchester.
Durham said a recording made by the
informants picked up a series of mocking, profane assertions by Gentile
about his view of the competency of the FBI.
"He says, 'The FBI got some of my guns, they didn't get all of my guns,' " Durham said.
There
was no reason on the part of the FBI to contrive a crime against
Gentile to force him to talk, Durham said. The agents needed only to
pick one from the recordings the informants enabled them to make. Ross wrote:
Ross 22209
If I were FBI Boston’s new
head Harold Shaw, I would have the FBI do a consent search of residence
where Bobby Guarente and David Turner would stay in Revere, MA. I
believe the address was/is 21 Roosevelt, Revere, MA.
Last I knew, it was still owned by Bobby Guarente’s younger friend, Jean Marie Wilson.
Bobby Guarente and Jean W. had lived at the farmhouse in Madison, ME
with Bobby’s wife, Elene, for a while until it got weird. Elene then
asked that she move out. (They had been former roommates in Boston).
I believe Jean W now lives at 6 Belmont St., Saugus — having shared for
years a duplex with her daughter Amy and maybe still Amy’s husband, who
was Bobby Guarente’s nephew. The nephew is Michael James Guerriero. He
may at least know who knew Bobby Guarantee as “Unk” or “Unc.” Michael
and his wife Amy (Jean’s daughter) have lived in the other unit of the
duplex..
None of the residents would have had anything at all to do with the
heist and so I expect they would just grant the FBI to consent to bring
in equipment that could see through walls.
Or perhaps they would speak to a reporter and correct any misapprehensions or misstatements of facts above.
@Ross 22209
A note was left at the 6 Belmont St. last year, Saugus
address to further corroborate the information provided by Elene and Mr.
Berghman but the residents did not respond. Daniel W. lives at the
Revere address and so he or Jean likely perhaps could consent to a
search — in view of the $5 million reward.
But the hearing yesterday answered a question that had been part of
puzzle: why hadn’t Bobby Guarente sprung “bad boy” David Turner .
According to Earle Berghman, Bobby G. viewed David “like a son."
From Mr. Mahony’s follow-up article today (Jan 7) and the prosecutor’s
comment yesterday, it is unclear to me whether the prosecutor was
referring when such an attempt was made in 1992 (through attorney Marty
Leppo with the state rejecting) or in the late 1990s. Or maybe even Mr.
Berghman’s, Elene’s and daughter Jeanine’s attempt to return the
paintings in 2004.
Maybe the prosecutor was referring to 1992 attempt to return the
paintings. Maybe by the brilliant FBI armored car sting in the late
1990s, Bobby G. had just decided that such an offer would again be
rejected and that authorities would find a way to prosecute anyone who
had been involved in the theft.
Bobby had his own legal troubles and was getting out of prison about the
time of the armored car sting prosecution and moving to Maine.
Given Jean W’s total non-involvement, maybe the insight she could shed would advance things.
A Pulitzer awaits whoever gets the next article as fascinating as Mr. Mahony’s article this past week about “Unk."
Jean W. could collect the reward given her bona fides and general niceness.
@Ross 22209
I think the FBI is doing a great job — even though I think counter terrorism should remain a far higher priority.
At the end of the day, I think the heist represents the
greatest act of vandalism in history — I think the two main paintings
were destroyed by a flood under Gentile’s shed.
Respectfully, I think those who want to write a big Hollywood ending
(like the investigative reporters, FBI and the security director) are in
denial in not admitting that.
It was Bobby Gentile’s son who described how upset he was when he
realized that the flood had destroyed what he had hidden in a tupperware
container under his shed.
p.s. I think it’s a hoot that the defense counsel and journalist and
prosecutor are treating the polygraphs the way they do. There is not
close to the reliability that they claim — and I am simply amazed to see
a defense counsel even indirectly suggest that there is.
Defense counsel’s father’s contingency for 1/3 of the reward for return
of the paintings belies defence counsel’s claim that he believes his
client when his client claims that he does not have sufficient
information leading to access.
-Art Hostage Comments:
Ross, above, raises some good points, not least the allegation Mr Gentile's lawyer A.
Ryan McGuigan indirectly has a stake in any recovery of the Gardner art, therefore raising suspicion that even he believes there is a chance Gentile could provide assistance in recovering at least some Gardner art. Furthermore, I wonder if the alleged A.
Ryan McGuigan deal applies to other Gentile family members, Elene Guarante etc?
As regards the advice offered by Ross, I am certain Anthony Amore is fully aware of these details and would never leave any stone unturned. The possibility of two Gardner paintings being destroyed, either by water damage, or by fire has to be considered and can be argued as to why the reward clause of "Good condition" has been so rigorously enforced?
Indeed, to be fair to Anthony Amore, he did say to Art Hostage a very longtime ago:
"We don't want to pay a reward for a pile of ashes"
The FBI have been much maligned during the Gardner art Heist investigation, they have been in the unenviable position of being dammed if they do and dammed if they don't, but to be fair, they have only been doing their job and any deals for recovery must be the decision of Prosecutors in the end.
Aside from the two Gardner paintings which may or may not have been damaged beyond repair, there still remains the rest of the Gardner art to consider.
Sadly, what little trust there was historically seems to have disappeared with the recent events and until trust is rebuilt a Mexican stand-off will prevail. Having said that, the FBI will continue to try to recover the Gardner art and prosecute those responsible, not out of any malice aforethought, but because simply put, "it is their job description" and anything less leaves the FBI open to the criticism they could be encouraging further art thefts if they succumb to making deals.
The whole Gardner case is a complete mess, but with some trust and co-operation from all parties, a reasonable, positive outcome can be reached, even if some of the Gardner art has suffered terribly.
Reputed Mobster's Associate Adds New Mystery To Gardner Museum Art Heist
How A CT Man Is Helping The FBI Solve Gardner Museum Heist
For five years, investigators have focused
on a once-obscure gangster from Hartford as perhaps the last, best hope
of cracking history's richest art heist, the robbery a quarter century
ago of $500 million in paintings and other works from Boston's Isabella
Stewart Gardner Museum.
But what put Robert "The Cook" Gentile at
the center of the mystery and why authorities have pursued him
relentlessly has never been explained – until now.
In a series of interviews with The Courant, a longtime Gentile
associate who agreed to work with the FBI said he told agents Gentile
has acted for years as if he had access to the missing art, has talked
about selling it and, for a time, kept what appeared to have been a
lesser-known Gardner piece – a 200-year-old gilded eagle – at a used car
lot he owned in South Windsor.
Sebastian "Sammy" Mozzicato
delivered the astonishing account of Gentile and the world's best known
stolen art to the FBI a year ago after agents, dangling a $5 million
reward as a lure, enlisted him and a cousin as secret cooperators in the
recovery effort. Investigators have suspected for years – and Gentile
has denied for just as long – that he is withholding information about
the art. Agents recruited the cousins, their confidants for decades, as
participants in a sting that agents hoped would shake loose enough
information to locate the art.
The sting failed when Gentile grew suspicious, Mozzicato said. But before Gentile walked away, the cousins enabled the FBI to record him committing
to the sale of multiple paintings for millions of dollars. Mozzicato
said he believes Gentile has had access to the art since the late 1990s –
which is when investigators suspect he was part of a Boston gang that
gained control of the art from whoever stole it.
Sources close to the investigation said Mozzicato's account to the
newspaper is consistent both with what he told the FBI and with what
agents have collected elsewhere. His story of the art, from the mob's
perspective, is now at the heart of the investigation.
A federal
prosecutor has even claimed – during a proceeding in an unrelated case –
that Gentile "specifically suggested" he has two of the paintings. But,
suspicion aside, none of the art has been recovered, and no one has
been charged with stealing or hiding it.
The government's assertion and Mozzicato's inside account enrage Gentile, 80, whose health problems have reduced him to rolling around a federal jail in a wheelchair while awaiting trial on weapons charges. He has been locked up on drug and gun charges for most of the last five years.
In
repeated interviews over the past year and a half, Gentile has spat
angry denials at suggestions that he knows anything about the heist or
missing art. But he can be vague, too. He shrugs and smiles when told
that people who know him argue that he is a swindler who made himself a
top Gardner target by claiming – falsely – that he could obtain the art
to cheat would-be buyers.
In a court filing, defense lawyer A.
Ryan McGuigan implies Gentile's con is so slick that he duped the FBI.
McGuigan argues that Gentile was running a "scam for all it was worth in
hopes of getting some quick cash" and "proceeded to lead his merry band
of informers and double agents on a merry hunt for nonexistent
paintings."
In an interview, McGuigan dismissed Mozzicato's claims.
"Apparently,
the government is relying on sources which include murderers, drug
dealers and career criminals," McGuigan said. "Not exactly fine company
to keep."
One aspect of Mozzicato's account is undisputed: It
explains how someone, who for years had law enforcement convinced that
he was a second-rate crook, became the potential key to recovering some
of the world's most revered art. It doesn't answer why – if Gentile
knows anything – he continues to turn up his nose at the reward and
submit to continuous investigation and arrest.
Federal prosecutors
contend he is a sworn Mafia soldier, and some in law enforcement
speculate he is enjoying the consternation he is causing by adhering to
the mob's oath of silence. Gentile denies being a member of the Mafia.
Mozzicato
played a leading part in the failed FBI sting in 2014 and '15. But he
has told agents that he believes Gentile was involved with the art at
least 15 years earlier, beginning in the late 1990s. Among other things,
Mozzicato said he told the FBI how:
In the late 1990s, he was instructed to move a package of what he
suspects were paintings between cars outside a Waltham, Mass.,
condominium used by him, Gentile, fellow mobster Robert Guarente and
other partners of their Boston gang, which was a faction of the
Philadelphia Mafia. A day or two later, Mozzicato said Gentile and
Guarente drove the purported art to Maine, where Guarente owned a
farmhouse.
Not long afterward, Mozzicato said he listened to an animated
discussion between Gentile and Guarente about whether they should give
what they referred to only as "a painting" to one of their Philadelphia
mob bosses as "tribute." Mozzicato said Gentile argued that the painting
was "worth a fortune" and told his old friend Guarente "You're out of
your (expletive) mind" to give it away.
Also in the late 1990s, Mozzicato said Gentile gave him photographs
of five stolen paintings and asked him to act as an intermediary in
recruiting a buyer. Mozzicato said the potential buyer was shocked by
the paintings and complained, half jokingly, that they could be arrested
just for talking about them. Mozzicato said Gentile then cut him out of
the deal, but acknowledged later that it fell through.
Mozzicato said he and his cousin saw, on repeated occasions, what he
believes was the gilded eagle, cast two centuries ago in France as a
finial for a Napoleonic flagstaff. He said they saw it often on a shelf
at Gem Auto, the used car business Gentile formerly owned on Route 5 in
South Windsor. Mozzicato said he thinks Gentile later sold the eagle.
Mozzicato said he identified the finial from a photo provided by the
FBI.
There have been intriguing, if murky stories about the missing
art, but Mozzicato's is one of the more remarkable to emerge since the
robbery on March 18, 1990.
Early that morning, as St. Patrick's
Day celebrations wound down across Boston, two thieves disguised
themselves as police officers, bluffed their way into the Gardner, an
Italianate palazzo in Boston's Fenway. They bound the guards, battered
and slashed some of the world's most recognizable art from walls and
frames, and disappeared.
The thieves took 13 pieces, including "The
Concert" by Vermeer and two Rembrandts, one of them his only known
seascape, "Storm on the Sea of Galilee." The art was uninsured under the
terms of the bequest that created the museum and empty frames now hang
where art was displayed.
In spite of the reward and promises of
no-questions-asked immunity for anyone returning the art, the
investigation has run down repeated dead ends, in many cases because
promising targets are dying off among the aging circle of New England
mobsters. Nonetheless, a federal grand jury in New Haven was actively
investigating last summer and fall. An Unlikely Break
It
was not was until decades after the robbery and the events described by
Mozzicato at the Waltham condo during the late 1990s that Gentile moved
to the center of the Gardner investigation. It happened entirely by
chance early in 2010.
Gardner investigators were in Maine,
tracking Guarente, who they believed had managed to take control of at
least some of the art. He was a well-connected Boston bank robber and
drug dealer who was known by the nickname "Unk."
Guarente's
farmhouse was in the woods north of Portland. After his last arrest for
cocaine distribution in the late 1990s, he flirted with the idea of
cooperating with drug investigators. He didn't. He went to prison, moved
to Maine upon his release and died from cancer two years later, in
2004.
Gentile acknowledges that he and Guarente had been friends
since the 1970s when he said they met at a regional automobile auction
near Hartford. Law enforcement and other sources said the two were sworn
in, with others in their Boston gang, as soldiers in the Philadelphia
Mafia in the late 1990s.
A search by the Gardner investigators of
Guarente's farmhouse turned up empty. But they got a break when they
returned the keys to his widow, Elene Guarente. She declined to discuss
the encounter with The Courant. But a person with knowledge of the event
gave the following account:
After first denying even being aware of the Gardner museum, she blurted out, inexplicably, "My Bobby had two of the paintings."
In
ensuing interviews, she said that her husband kept the paintings in
Maine and, after his release from prison for the last time, he decided
to pass them to an associate.
She said Guarente put the paintings
in their car and they drove to Portland, where Guarente had arranged to
meet another couple at a downtown hotel. After the couples sat down for a
shore dinner, she said the men left briefly and walked outside.
She identified Gentile as the man who took possession of the two paintings. Gentile Cooperates
Gentile claims he is the victim of lies or speculation by hustlers
competing for the museum's $5 million reward. Elene Guarente, he said,
is chief among them.
"Everything is lies," he said. "They got no proof."
He
admits meeting the Guarentes at the Portland hotel. He said he met the
couple regularly. Guarente was sick and broke and Gentile said he was
supporting him. Gentile said he and his wife liked to drive and enjoyed
arranging weekend getaways or day trips around promising restaurants. He
said Portland's vibrant waterfront was a favorite destination.
"Bobby
Guarente always needed money," Gentile said. "One day he calls me. He
said he needed $300 for groceries. That's what he used to call it,
'Groceries.' He was sick at the time."
"I helped him out," Gentile said. "I've helped a lot of people."
Gentile
said he remembers picking up the check because Elene Guarente ordered
the most expensive item on the menu – the lobster special.
"I'm a sucker," Gentile said. "I'm the one picking up the check."
He
claims Elene Guarente implicated him out of spite. When her husband
died, Gentile said he told her that he had health problems of his own
and could no longer help her financially.
Complain
as Gentile might, Elene Guarente's spontaneous statement early in 2010
invigorated the investigation and brought its weight down on Gentile. To
disprove her allegation, he said he decided to cooperate himself. It
did not go well.
He submitted to a polygraph examination, during
which he denied having advance knowledge of the Gardner heist, ever
possessing a Gardner painting or knowing the location of any of the
stolen paintings. The result showed a likelihood of less than 0.1
percent that he was truthful, according to a government filing in
federal court.
Gentile and his lawyer claim the results are skewed because the test was improperly administered.
The
FBI next recruited a cooperating Hartford mobster "to engage (Gentile)
in general conversation," according to the same filing. Gentile boasted
to the cooperator that he and Guarente were soldiers in the Philadelphia
Mafia. He said Guarente "had masterminded the whole thing," and had
"flipped" before he died – a reference to Guarente's flirtation with
cooperation. When the informant asked Gentile if he had the paintings,
Gentile "just smiled," according to the filing.
Prosecutors
withdrew Gentile's cooperation agreement early in 2011, claiming he lied
when testifying before the Gardner grand jury.
A year later, they
were preparing to indict him for selling prescription painkillers. When
agents searched his small, suburban home in Manchester, they discovered
the cellar was packed with money, drugs, guns, ammunition, silencers,
explosives, handcuffs and a couple of odd pieces – a stuffed kestrel and
a pair of enormous elephant tusks.
Significantly,
they also found a copy of the March 19, 1990, Boston Herald, the
edition dominated by the Gardner heist. With the newspaper was a
handwritten list of the pieces the thieves stole and corresponding
values.
As with just about everything else turned up in the Gardner case, the list of paintings and prices has a murky provenance.
Massachusetts
art thief Florian "Al" Monday, who orchestrated the robbery of a
Rembrandt from the Worcester Art Museum in 1972, said in an interview
with The Courant that he wrote the list and that the values were his
estimates of what the Gardner pieces were worth on the black market.
Monday said he gave the list to Paul Papasodero, a forger, thief and
hair stylist from Milford, Mass.
Gentile said he and Papasodero
were friends. When Papasodero died in 2010, Gentile said he attended the
funeral. Gentile said in an interview he got the list from Papasodero
when, about a dozen years ago, he found himself – inadvertently and
entirely innocently – in the middle of a scam by Guarente to sell
paintings he believes Guarente did not have.
Based partly on what the FBI dragged out of
his cellar, Gentile was charged with drug and gun offenses and
sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison. The government told him he could
skip prison and go home with the reward if he led the FBI to the art.
Gentile said he knew nothing and served the time.
When he was released in April 2014, Mozzicato and his cousin were waiting. The Sting
Neither
was what could be called a model citizen. Mozzicato had been charged
with crimes repeatedly, but had avoided conviction on charges such as
racketeering, extortion and assault. Ronnie Bowes had been convicted of
murder.
Mozzicato said he had reformed and was selling cars at a
suburban Hartford dealership and said his cousin was selling antiques
from a shop in Charlton, Mass., when the FBI tracked them down and
offered a crack at the $5 million. The two men, through their families,
had known Gentile most of their lives. Bowes had been diagnosed with
cancer and, at the time, had been told he had only months to live.
Bowes
had left Connecticut years earlier, in the early 1980s, to try his hand
at the drug business in South Florida. Something went wrong one night
in 1983 after he agreed to sell 50 pounds of marijuana to four men from
Tennessee on a swampy key in the Florida Straits, according to court
records. When the smoke cleared, the Tennesseans were dead, and someone
had shot off one of Bowes' thumbs.
The police caught him in
Vernon. He was extradited to Key West, convicted on three murder charges
and sentenced to death. An appeals court agreed with his claim of self
defense and released him after 14 years. He was back in Connecticut in
the late 1990s.
By the time of Gentile's release, Mozzicato said
he was persuaded by events dating to the late 1990s and the events at
the Waltham condominium that Gentile had access to the Gardner art.
Incidents that, years earlier, appeared to be insignificant or
unconnected, seemed to have fallen into a pattern, he said.
There
was the transfer of suspected paintings between cars and the argument
about a painting as tribute to the Philadelphia mob. Mozzicato said he
had been baffled initially by the frightened reaction of the potential
buyer to whom he showed five photographs of paintings. He said he became
convinced when, pressed by the FBI to identify the gilded eagle he said
he saw at Gentile's used car lot, he selected a photograph of the
stolen Gardner finial from an FBI photo array.
"I'm no art
expert," Mozzicato said. "But I know this is bigger than me. It's bigger
than Bobby. This is about the people who can't see those paintings
hanging on the wall. That art should be returned. Of course, the $5
million reward doesn't sound too bad either."
The FBI arranged to
have the cousins be among the first to welcome Gentile home from prison.
Mozzicato said he was sitting on a bench at a shopping plaza in South
Windsor when Gentile, understated as ever, drove up in his old Buick.
Bowes was his passenger. Mozzicato said he jumped in back.
Gentile
was so heavy he couldn't fasten his seat belt. Since the Gardner heist
had made him a hot FBI target, Gentile was afraid any arrest, even a
seat belt violation, could jeopardize his parole.
"He's got bungee
cords he's got to use for the seat belt," Mozzicato said. "He says, 'I
can't get arrested. The seat belt don't fit. They told me to buy this
thing. I'll use this.' He's in the car. He can barely turn."
Mozzicato
said he began making Gardner references immediately. He complained that
he and Bowes, well-known to law enforcement as Gentile associates, were
being harassed by the FBI's Gardner team. He said he told Gentile that
the agents knew Gentile had enlisted him in an attempt to sell a Gardner
painting. Gentile growled that the FBI didn't know what it was talking
about, but referred specifically to the prospective buyer, Mozzicato
said.
Mozzicato said agents were listening to and recording the
conversation – and those that followed – over concealed transmitters the
cousins wore.
He said he and Bowes were soon meeting regularly
with Gentile, handing him cash provided by the government, a supposed
acknowledge that Gentile, a made member of the Mafia, was the boss.
"We're
giving him envelopes. 'Here Boss. How you doing?'," Mozzicato said.
"He'd look inside and say, 'Hey kid. You did good today, kid. Who would
have thought? This is like old times. Let's go get lunch.'"
The
money was meant to reinforce a fiction the FBI hoped would induce
Gentile to produce the art. Mozzicato said he and Bowes were claiming
that they had created a marijuana distribution network and were flush
with cash. More to the point, they told Gentile they had a way to earn
even more – the rich New Jersey dealer who was buying their pot had
devised a foolproof plan to cash in on the Gardner art.
Mozzicato
said the cousins told Gentile that the dealer would pay $500,000 for a
painting. The painting would be delivered to a lawyer in Seattle, who
would arrange to return it to the museum anonymously and collect a
reward under the museum's no-questions-asked offer. Gentile was promised
"two ends" of the transaction – the $500,000 up-front and a piece of
whatever the reward turned out to be for a single painting.
Mozzicato
said he told Gentile: "'If it goes good, the first one, you can do it
again, for all the paintings. Everyone's got a chance to make a lot of
money.' "
Gentile seemed intrigued, Mozzicato said, but would not
act. Over spring and summer in 2014, Mozzicato said the cousins pressed
and complained that he was missing a chance at big money. He said
Gentile waved the subject aside or ignored them. The reaction was not
unexpected, Mozzicato said. Gentile could be obstinate when pressed and
suspicious when pressed harder.
Gentile told the cousins that he
finally agreed to test the plan with one painting. Mozzicato said he
committed over a lunch with the cousins at La Casa Bella in South
Windsor. Mozzicato said the FBI listened to the conversation from the
parking lot.
"Bobby starts going, 'If that goes over good, we
could probably do others'," Mozzicato said. "My cousin and I are
thinking: 'Bobby's dead in the water. This is all on tape.' "
Bowes
wanted to leave the restaurant that minute to get a painting, Mozzicato
said, but Gentile applied the brakes again. Mozzicato said Gentile
wanted five days, maybe a week, to put the deal together. On one of
those days, Gentile said he would have to take a five-hour drive, one
way.
"Here he is saying, 'Yes. I'll get it. We'll do it for half a
million. Set it up. I need a week.' My cousin says to Bobby, 'I'll go
with you .' Bobby says, 'No, no, no. Me and Sammy got to go. Sammy knows
the guy we got to see.' "
Mozzicato said Gentile would not reveal why
he needed a week, where he was driving to, whom he was seeing or where
the paintings were or how many he could get.
Bowes insisted that
the cousins be allowed to tell the fictitious New Jersey pot buyer to
get ready for a painting, Mozzicato said.
Mozzicato said the FBI recorded Gentile answering, "Yes, I'll do it." 'The Deal Sounds Good'
But
the next time they met, Gentile was stalling again, Mozzicato said. To
prod him, Mozzicato said the FBI arranged to have the cousins introduce
him to an undercover agent posing as a representative of the New Jersey
pot dealer. Over another lunch, the agent told Gentile that his boss
might shut down the pot business if Gentile did not sell a painting.
Gentile
responded with a threat of his own. Federal prosecutor John Durham
described the exchange during a bail hearing in court earlier this year,
providing a rare public statement about the government's interest in
Gentile.
"Mr. Gentile specifically stated to the FBI undercover
operative that he, Mr. Gentile, is a made member of La Cosa Nostra,"
Durham said. "Mr. Gentile had specifically suggested that he had two
particular paintings that had been stolen in the Gardner incident many
years ago. Mr. Gentile became furious with the FBI undercover person
because he wouldn't engage in the marijuana deal with Mr. Gentile, at
which point Mr. Gentile told the undercover agent, do you know who I am,
and stated that he could have people killed and make them disappear."
Frustrated
by the delays, Mozzicato said his cousin offered Gentile a way to save
face on the chance that the paintings had been lost or destroyed. The
FBI knew that someone had dug a hole beneath a shed in Gentile's
backyard, apparently as a hiding place. If the art had been buried, it
could be ruined,
"Ronnie says to him, 'If you don't have the
paintings anymore, if you destroyed them, if you don't want to do it
anymore, just tell me. So we don't look stupid. Because the guy in New
Jersey is asking. I told him I'd ask you. Sammy said he would ask you.
So, if you don't want to do it, just say so.' And then Ronnie says to
Bobby, 'If you're just doing this to steal the half a million, that's
fine too.' "
"Bobby says, 'No. No. No. I'd never do that,' "
Mozzicato said. "And then he goes, 'Let's do it. The deal sounds good.
We can all use the money.' " Into The Woods
Not
long after, in August 2014, Mozzicato said Gentile called with
instructions. He was to drive to a pay telephone in South Windsor and
wait for a call. From the pay phone, Mozzicato said Gentile directed him
to a truck stop on I-84 in Ashford.
At the truck stop, he said
Gentile ordered him to leave his cellphone and car behind. He said
Gentile drove the two of them through the woods for a half-hour or so to
a house on the Massachusetts side of the state line. Inside, Mozzicato
said a man was seated in a corner and a couple of guys were standing
apart, as if waiting to be told what to do. Mozzicato said one of them
frisked him.
"So I look at Bobby," Mozzicato said. "He give me the
look, like, 'Go with it.' Then, the guy in the corner says, 'So Sammy.
How ya doing? I heard about you from Unk."
Unk was Guarente's nickname.
Mozzicato
said the man refused to identify himself, which did not seem to bother
Gentile. Mozzicato said Gentile told him to explain the plan to sell a
painting for $500,000. Mozzicato said he did. He said the man considered
for a while and responded with a couple of questions.
"So the guy
just comes out with all these hypotheticals," Mozzicato said, "He says,
'Let's just say, hypothetically, not that I have them or anything,
these pictures. But hypothetically,' he says, 'Bobby is saying, you got a
guy. So, hypothetically, if I had one, or two, or maybe three, if I had
them, you could get me this money and do this deal?' "
The man
wanted the identity of the buyer. Mozzicato said he told him it was none
of his business. Mozzicato said Gentile ordered him to wait outside. A
few minutes later, he said Gentile came out and drove them back to the
truck stop.
A few days later, Mozzicato said Gentile told him to
rent a commercial storage unit and a car. Then, Mozzicato said, Gentile
canceled the car. Mozzicato said he accompanied Gentile when he picked
up a supposedly indestructible German lock from a used car lot in
Hartford's South End, where Gentile used to pass the time with a handful
of aging Hartford gangsters.
Then, Mozzicato said, Gentile went silent again. Mozzicato said he believes Gentile had grown suspicious.
Mozzicato
said: "Now this kind of conversation starts: He says 'Something ain't
right.' He's talking with Ronnie one day, 'You know, Ronnie?. We've been
through a lot. You and Sammy are all I got left. But something ain't
right.' "
"Then he started with me. 'Sammy boy. Sammy boy. These paintings bring nothing but heartache. They are nothing but a problem.' "
Mozzicato
said Gentile complained that, even if he were to cooperate with the
government and turn in the paintings, he was convinced the FBI would
figure out a way to prevent him from getting the reward.
Mozzicato said, "He says, 'The feds will never let me spend the money. I don't care what deal my lawyer tells me.' "
Six
months later, on March 2, 2015, the FBI watched as Bowes used $1,000 in
FBI cash to buy a .38 Colt Cobra revolver and six rounds of ammunition
from Gentile. Within weeks, Bowes was dead of cancer and Gentile had
been indicted on weapons charges.
The FBI gave Gentile another
opportunity. If he cooperated, he would avoid a long prison sentence and
perhaps collect a reward. He cursed at the agents and claimed again to
know nothing about the art.
A federal magistrate declared him a
threat to public safety, again, and denied him bail while awaiting trial
and the likelihood of another prison sentence.
He is arguing that
the charges should be dismissed because of prosecutorial misconduct. He
said the gun case was contrived to force him to give up information
about the art – information he doesn't have.
Suffolk Downs Was Searched For Gardner Heist Paintings
BOSTON (CBS) — The search for the paintings stolen in the 1990 Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum heist led authorities to Suffolk Downs a few months ago.
Acting on a tip, the FBI searched a couple of locations at
the racetrack in September for some sign of the thirteen paintings,
worth hundreds of millions of dollars. But Suffolk Downs CEO Chip Tuttle
said their search didn’t come up with anything.
“Obviously, we cooperated fully with the FBI,” Tuttle told
WBZ NewsRadio 1030 Monday. “It was actually very impressive, they had a
big team, they were very serious, they went through the entire facility
sort of with a fine-toothed comb. But the paintings are not at Suffolk
Downs.”
Tuttle said the call from the FBI came as a surprise for the
staff–that nobody could imagine the long-missing works by Rembrandt,
Degas, Manet, and Vermeer could be stashed at the track.
“At first, it was almost humorous,” said Tuttle. “You laugh
it off, the idea that these famous paintings that people have been
looking for for years might be right underneath your nose.”
But Tuttle said authorities had a theory that, when
explained, seemed plausible–that someone may have stashed the paintings
there while the facilities were closed in the early 90s, around the time
of the heist.
“The track, of course, was closed in 1990 and ’91,” said Tuttle. “It
closed at the end of 1989 and reopened in ’92. So, the way they
explained the premise was, perhaps someone had stashed them there when
the track was closed. Then it made a little more sense that they would
be interested in taking a look around.”
Areas of the building that had been closed for more than 20
years were searched, and the FBI teams even opened a couple of old safes
that nobody in the track’s current administration could ever remember
opening. They found nothing.
The paintings were stolen March 18, 1990, when the FBI says two white
men disguised in Boston police uniforms were able to enter the museum
by telling a security guard that they were responding to a disturbance.
Once inside, the thieves handcuffed two security guards and kept them in
the museum’s basement.
The FBI has said in the past that they know who took the paintings, and that those people are now dead–but the feds have never said who the suspects who pulled off the heist were.
In August, the FBI released new surveillance footage
from the night before the heist, showing a security guard letting in an
unauthorized visitor 24 hours before the art was stolen.
Days later, a Quincy attorney said a former client of his had identified the visitor in the video.